I think we might need a bit more context to help you.
If your code does what i think it does (and whithout having a look at the constructor of the EnemyBoss i cant be sure) your mistakes is not within those lines.
Look up the singleton pattern. People used to think singletons were really good things, but opinion has changed and some people say singletons are evil. It might be appropriate to make your boss a singleton. That would mean you can get as many references to the boss object as you like; they will all point to the same object.
Natasha Morehouse wrote:Here is the code I have to spawn the boss:
Which looks like it will spawn a boss (whatever that means) whenever you reach level 5. I'm not quite sure if I agree with Campbell's advice about making it a singleton (although I definitely agree with him that they're worth knowing about), but you do need to record somewhere that you've already spawned a boss.
Then your code might look something like:Winston
Isn't it funny how there's always time and money enough to do it WRONG?
Articles by Winston can be found here
Joined: Oct 13, 2005
Winston Gutkowski wrote: . . . I'm not quite sure if I agree with Campbell's advice about making it a singleton . . .
Nor am I. I was offering it as a suggestion rather than advice.
An alternative is to have a static count variable in the Boss class; you only instantiate the class if it is 0. If you are multi‑threading, that method can allow several Boss objects to exist, if the constructor is accessed simultaneously by several threads. Again just a suggestion, rather than advice.