This week's giveaway is in the Android forum. We're giving away four copies of Android Security Essentials Live Lessons and have Godfrey Nolan on-line! See this thread for details.

I'm trying to calculate the angle between two co ordinates. I am not sure where to start. If necessary I can provide side lengths as with a triangle but if I use the law of cosine I dont know what to use in Java to represent the inverse of cosine. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

It seems to me you could only get a line between two coordinates, but the class you're looking for is java.lang.Math. There you'll find a method called acos(). Does that do it for you?

Greg Charles wrote:There you'll find a method called acos().

It is normally better to use atan2() when getting the angle of a line since it automatically resolves the quadrant ambiguity and deals better acos() for small angles ( or angles near 90 degrees when one uses asin()). One still has to manually handle the condition where the two points are co-incident.

I presume you mean the angle at the origin of the coordinate system between two lines to different coordinates. As long as the coordinates are both not (0, 0), you can simply return 0° if they refer to the same point.

Campbell Ritchie wrote:I presume you mean the angle at the origin of the coordinate system between two lines to different coordinates. As long as the coordinates are both not (0, 0), you can simply return 0° if they refer to the same point.

I think we are talking at cross-purposes. I was assuming that given two points P1 and P2 the OP wanted the angle atan2(P2.x-P1.x, P2.y-P1.y) but I suspect you think he wants (atan2(P2.x,P2.y) - atan2(P1.x,P1.y) ) . The OP needs to clarify.

Campbell Ritchie
Sheriff

Joined: Oct 13, 2005
Posts: 38046

22

posted

0

Yes, I was thinking there were two lines through the origin and we wanted the angle between them. You thought there was a line passing through two points and we want its gradient as an angle from the horizontal.

Agree.

Daniel Devlin
Greenhorn

Joined: Sep 05, 2011
Posts: 15

posted

0

Thanks for the replies. I'll try to clarify my post as I haven't done so (apologies). I have an image on which I can select two points e.g. 23,45 and 45,88. These would be the coordinates of the two selections. I know need to be able to move along the line between the two coordinates. My intention was to create a triangle where the origin would be the intersection between the coordinates of the row of the first click and the column of the last one. I could use this to then calculate the lengths of hypotenuse , adjacent, and opposite. I know the triangle is a right angle triangle and so now I can calculate the angle between the points. To find the angle in trigonometry would be a2 + b2 -c2/2ab and then inverse the cos of this value. I may be doing this the completely wrong way but this is what I'm trying to do. Then if I know the angle between the points I can say if angle is between 0 and 45degrees go up one pixel then recalculate if its greater than 45 and less than 120 go right 1 pixel etc.

In my last post in this thread I gave the equation you require to get the angle (the one that uses the single atan2()). BUT, you don't really say what you mean by 'move along the line' and depending on what you are doing as you move there are fast algorithms that do not require you to actually calculate the angle. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bresenham%27s_line_algorithm .

Daniel Devlin
Greenhorn

Joined: Sep 05, 2011
Posts: 15

posted

0

By travelling along the line I mean moving pixel by pixel to the target co ordinate using the angle to determine which pixel is chosen to move to next.

And I think that's how Richard interpreted it. No trigonometry is required for this; it's just algebra - finding the equation of a line in the x-y plane. The link Richard gave gives additional details.

Daniel Devlin wrote:By travelling along the line I mean moving pixel by pixel to the target co ordinate using the angle to determine which pixel is chosen to move to next.

I'm no GUI expert, but that strikes me as very involved way of going about things, and is likely to result in transformations that only move the component in one direction, which might result in odd visual effects if you're using it for animation.

If you are, my suspicion is that you'd need to keep t (your time) independently of your movement, and only move when the result is "close enough" to your axis of movement; but, as I say, I'm no expert, and there may well be libraries out there for doing exactly what you want.

Winston

Isn't it funny how there's always time and money enough to do it WRONG?
Articles by Winston can be found here