This is a bit embarrassing to ask... Feel like I should know this by now....
When talking about volatile variables, we always say that thread has a local copy of a variable from the main memory. Writes needs to be flushed out to take affect. I just realized this didn't make sense to me quite 100%. I think because I don't have enough knowledge on the hardware side.
What is the significance of that local copy of an variable? Does it correspond to register? CPU cache?
I am not quite sure, but I think it corresponds to the copy in RAM. Rather than using the copy in a register or a cache, a volatile field must be written back to the object it belongs to, in the heap. So all changes are seen in the copy on the heap.
Anybody else know better than me?
Yeah, threads are allowed to keep copies of a variable "somewhere". This is intentionally vague, so platforms are free to optimize code as they see fit. In practice, "somewhere" may refer to both the CPU registers and the CPU caches.
If two different threads perform operations on the same variable, they may actually perform operations on their cached copy of the variable, and when they finally write the result back to memory, they will overwrite the value another thread wrote to memory earlier. A volatile variable may not be cached, so when a thread performs an operation on it, another thread will immediately see the results of that operation. This does not guarantee however, that operations are performed in the proper order. For this you need to synchronize access to the variable.
Note that Java requires all platforms to update the variable in main memory when a thread leaves a critical section (synchronized block). This means that the volatile keyword is almost never used, because synchronizing your variable access is sufficient. Volatile variables are usually only used when they serve to signal one thread from another, and no other synchronization between them is needed:
Here the run() method is continuously running, performing some action until another thread signals the object to stop. A volatile boolean can be used instead of two synchronized methods, because the two threads perform atomic operations on it (a simple assign, and a simple access).
The mind is a strange and wonderful thing. I'm not sure that it will ever be able to figure itself out, everything else, maybe. From the atom to the universe, everything, except itself.
I’ve looked at a lot of different solutions, and in my humble opinion Aspose is the way to go. Here’s the link: http://aspose.com
subject: What's the point of having a copy of variable in thread