This week's book giveaway is in the Jobs Discussion forum.
We're giving away four copies of Soft Skills and have John Sonmez on-line!
See this thread for details.
The moose likes Rattlesnake Pit and the fly likes Moderating in the Pit: How to achieve productive fallacy spotting? Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


Win a copy of Soft Skills this week in the Jobs Discussion forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Other » Rattlesnake Pit
Bookmark "Moderating in the Pit: How to achieve productive fallacy spotting?" Watch "Moderating in the Pit: How to achieve productive fallacy spotting?" New topic
Author

Moderating in the Pit: How to achieve productive fallacy spotting?

Bert Bates
author
Sheriff

Joined: Oct 14, 2002
Posts: 8883
    
    5
It seems that - like so many things - policing for arguments with fallacies exists on a spectrum:

At one end we have "no policing for fallacies": This strategy makes you an easy mark and wastes a lot of time.

At the far end you can become a pedant, and needlessly derail well-intended, reasonably logical discussions.

It seems there ought to be some sort of useful 80/20 rules, or rules of thumb for the correct use of fallacy policing.

For example, I'm trying to get skilled at spotting false dichotomies. (e.g. "you're either with us or you're against us"). It seems to me that if I'm watching a debate or reading an article, and the speaker bases his argument on a false dichotomy, I can comfortably move on - no need to waste time. This might be a useful moderation technique, if used compassionately, e.g.:

"Bob, we shut down arguments that are based on false dichotomies, come back and start again when your argument has a solid foundation"


Spot false dilemmas now, ask me how!
(If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much room.)
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: Moderating in the Pit: How to achieve productive fallacy spotting?