This week's book giveaway is in the Jobs Discussion forum.
We're giving away four copies of Java Interview Guide and have Anthony DePalma on-line!
See this thread for details.
The moose likes Other Application Frameworks and the fly likes Scheduler Using Spring Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login

Win a copy of Java Interview Guide this week in the Jobs Discussion forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Frameworks » Other Application Frameworks
Bookmark "Scheduler Using Spring" Watch "Scheduler Using Spring" New topic

Scheduler Using Spring

Adeel Ansari
Ranch Hand

Joined: Aug 15, 2004
Posts: 2874
Hey its not working. No errors though, but showing up nothing. The code goes like this...

applicationContext.xml : Snippet

dispatcher.xml : Snippet

I am getting the message from SmsAutoResponder constructor. But after that for 90 seconds nothing appears and program exits.

Can you spot possible errors or what I am missing?

[ October 24, 2008: Message edited by: Adeel Ansari ]
Nathan Pruett

Joined: Oct 18, 2000
Posts: 4121

Does your Spring applicationContext.xml also contain a bean definition for org.springframework.scheduling.quartz.SchedulerFactoryBean specifying the smsAutoResponderTrigger you're using? This is the main Quartz bean that handles firing triggers, calling jobs, etc. If this isn't defined, the trigger isn't going to be fired.

Write once, run anywhere, because there's nowhere to hide! - /. A.C.
Adeel Ansari
Ranch Hand

Joined: Aug 15, 2004
Posts: 2874
Oops. I missed that. I found it here as well,
Spring Framework Reference : Scheduling. Previously, i failed to notice this particular snippet, I wonder.

Thanks, Nathan.
Adeel Ansari
Ranch Hand

Joined: Aug 15, 2004
Posts: 2874
At first I was following the example given in JavaRanch Journal. It was just fine. The only thing I realized now is, Christophe, repeated the SimpleTriggerBean in that particular example, but not the SchedulerFactoryBean. And I completely agree, that its reasonable to not repeat that since that would be exactly same even if repeated. But I beleive, it would have been better to mention it, at least.

Bottom line, I didn't read that thoroughly and missed that important snippet.
I agree. Here's the link:
subject: Scheduler Using Spring
It's not a secret anymore!