File APIs for Java Developers
Manipulate DOC, XLS, PPT, PDF and many others from your application.
http://aspose.com/file-tools
The moose likes Web Services Certification (SCDJWS/OCEJWSD) and the fly likes The children of SOAP's body should be namespaced qualified or may be? Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


Win a copy of Android Security Essentials Live Lessons this week in the Android forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » Web Services Certification (SCDJWS/OCEJWSD)
Bookmark "The children of SOAP Watch "The children of SOAP New topic
Author

The children of SOAP's body should be namespaced qualified or may be?

Himai Minh
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 29, 2012
Posts: 722
According to this specification , http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/NOTE-SOAP-20000508/ , it says "the immediate children element of SOAP body may be namespace qualified".
But according to MZ's notes , p27, it says all immediate children should be namespace qualified.
So, which statement is valid?
Frits Walraven
Creator of Enthuware JWS+ V6
Bartender

Joined: Apr 07, 2010
Posts: 1636
    
  23

So, which statement is valid?

When you consider the SOAP specifications v1.1 : it is MAY be qualified (Immediate child elements of the SOAP Body element MAY be namespace-qualified.)

When you conform yourself to the Basic Profile v1.1: it MUST be qualified (R1014 The children of the soap:Body element in an ENVELOPE MUST be namespace qualified.)

So actually, both are correct...

Regards,
Frits
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: The children of SOAP's body should be namespaced qualified or may be?
 
Similar Threads
Do grandchildren of Soap:body element need to be fully qualified?
Doubt in soap:header
Problem in soap response it gives me some faultcode..
SOAP doubt: The Body element
NameSpace