This week's book giveaways are in the Refactoring and Agile forums.
We're giving away four copies each of Re-engineering Legacy Software and Docker in Action and have the authors on-line!
See this thread and this one for details.
Win a copy of Re-engineering Legacy Software this week in the Refactoring forum
or Docker in Action in the Cloud/Virtualization forum!
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic

what should happen to Edward Snowden?

 
Jeanne Boyarsky
author & internet detective
Marshal
Posts: 34095
337
Eclipse IDE Java VI Editor
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
The New York Times has a variety of opinions from "he should be given a medal" to "he should be put to death".
 
Bear Bibeault
Author and ninkuma
Marshal
Pie
Posts: 64631
86
IntelliJ IDE Java jQuery Mac Mac OS X
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
He should be exiled to Russia.

Oh, wait ...
 
fred rosenberger
lowercase baba
Bartender
Posts: 12086
29
Chrome Java Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I'm really torn on this one. I do think the U.S. government has over-reached on the cell phone and other mass-data gathering programs.

However, he did break the law.

The death penalty is a ridiculous suggestion.
 
Bert Bates
author
Sheriff
Posts: 8898
5
  • Likes 2
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
The way the world is going in general, I think we should err on the side of defending whistle blowers.
 
J. Kevin Robbins
Bartender
Posts: 1728
19
Chrome Firefox Browser jQuery Linux MySQL Database Netbeans IDE
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Personally, I think he's a hero. There have many of us in the I.T. business warning about this sort of surveillance for 20 years, but we were dismissed as tin-foil hat wearing conspiracy theorists. Snowden proved that the actual activity went way beyond what even the most ardent conspiracy advocates would have believed.

The government, especially the NSA and the IRS, needs to be reined in, but I seriously doubt that it will ever happen. We are already well on our way to an Orwellian, totalitarian state unless radical changes are made soon.
 
Pat Farrell
Rancher
Posts: 4678
7
Linux Mac OS X VI Editor
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I'm split, I have argued both sides with myself, and lost the argument.

On one side, he blew the whistle on some (IMHO) egregious over extensions of what is allowable, plus pointed out some serious hypocrisy (banning Huawei, ZTE from the US market because the Chinese government spies).

On the other, he had a security clearance, probably Top Secret/SCI. Even a simple Secret clearance requires that you sign a foot high stack of papers explaining that you are privileged to have this access, and if you pass any of it on, you are committing a long list of felony crimes. So he signed, and then he pass it on. Ergo, he is a criminal.

I'll probably settle for letting him freeze the rest of his life in Putin's Russia.

 
Paul Clapham
Sheriff
Pie
Posts: 20764
30
Eclipse IDE Firefox Browser MySQL Database
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Well, you know, there's a tremendous systemic bias against whistle-blowers, regardless of who they are blowing the whistle against. It starts in childhood, where you wouldn't ever dare tell the teacher about nefarious goings-on in the schoolyard, and doesn't get much better in adulthood. Would you rat out (there you are, the phrase has its own built-in bias) your neighbour for dumping out used engine oil in the back lane?

And so just the fact that people here are not willing to condemn Snowden that strongly translates into an overwhelming vote of confidence when you factor out that systemic bias.
 
Richard Tookey
Bartender
Posts: 1166
17
Java Linux Netbeans IDE
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Here in the UK revelations about phone tapping by the press and security services, the abuse of the RIPA law, the sexual and physical abuse of children by priests, the Snowden leaks about the security services, 'plebgate', the 'weapons of mass destruction' lies and fraudulent expense claims by politician are just a few of the examples of why our politicians, police, churches, local authorities, armed forces, press and security services cannot be trusted. Without whistle blowers much of this abuse of position and power would be never see the light of day and, though whistle blowing goes against my upbringing, I find I am generally in favour of it.
 
Jeanne Boyarsky
author & internet detective
Marshal
Posts: 34095
337
Eclipse IDE Java VI Editor
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I had to read what plebgate was. Luckily, wikipedia has a page on the topic.
 
Richard Tookey
Bartender
Posts: 1166
17
Java Linux Netbeans IDE
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
This one is interesting. Is there also a 'statute of limitation' date on Snowden's action?
 
Greg Charles
Sheriff
Posts: 2984
12
Firefox Browser IntelliJ IDE Java Mac Ruby
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I don't think the statute of limitations applies to people who have fled the jurisdiction. That's based on my decades of experience watching TV police procedurals.
 
Henry Wong
author
Marshal
Pie
Posts: 20902
76
C++ Chrome Eclipse IDE Firefox Browser Java jQuery Linux VI Editor Windows
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Richard Tookey wrote:This one is interesting. Is there also a 'statute of limitation' date on Snowden's action?


To directly answer the questions, even though Greg's response answered it too ...

I believe Snowden was charged with espionage -- and with that charge, I don't think that there is a statute of limitations.

Henry


PS... as with Fred's response, I too, am not a lawyer.
 
fred rosenberger
lowercase baba
Bartender
Posts: 12086
29
Chrome Java Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
IANAL, but I think Greg is at least partially right. I think the U.S. could file charges within the time period. The fact that they can't have a trial because he is hiding or Russia refuses to extradite him isn't their fault. The purpose of the limit is to protect the defendant's rights - a speedy trial for one. If the trial is delayed due to the defendant's own actions, the limit wouldn't apply.
 
Richard Tookey
Bartender
Posts: 1166
17
Java Linux Netbeans IDE
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
So, unless he is given a Presidential Pardon, it looks like Snowden is stuffed and will remain in exile forever.
 
Henry Wong
author
Marshal
Pie
Posts: 20902
76
C++ Chrome Eclipse IDE Firefox Browser Java jQuery Linux VI Editor Windows
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Richard Tookey wrote:So, unless he is given a Presidential Pardon, it looks like Snowden is stuffed and will remain in exile forever.



Just being somewhat anal .... Technically, since Snowden hasn't been convicted, it would be more of an immunity than a pardon. Of course, the next question is has a president ever granted a presidential "pardon" to someone who hasn't been convicted?

Henry
 
Jelle Klap
Bartender
Posts: 1951
7
Eclipse IDE Java
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
The man's a hero, plain and simple. He sacrificed everything to do what was morally right. What the NSA did, and continues to do, is criminal. I can't believe these revelations haven't caused more outrage than they have. Both domestically within the US, and internationally - especially the latter. I find the seemingly apathetic response of a lot of people and govenments truely incomprehensible. I wonder how that must be like for Snowden, screaming at the top of his lungs: "Look! Look at what they're doing! Look at what they're getting away with! Don't you understand how wrong this is? Don't you understand how dangerous this is?", and people just shrug it off.
 
Pat Farrell
Rancher
Posts: 4678
7
Linux Mac OS X VI Editor
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Jelle Klap wrote:What the NSA did, and continues to do, is criminal. I can't believe these revelations haven't caused more outrage than they have.


I agree that what NSA did was immoral and excessive and stupid over the long term. But its unlikely that what they did is criminal under US Law.

The US population and politicians were terrorized by the 9/11 attacks, and were willing to do anything to prevent another. The Congress passed near-idiotic laws that attack the very heart of the freedoms that make America great.

The law enforcement bureaucrats, like all bureaucrats at all times, saw an opportunity to grow their power and budgets and jumped on it.

IMHO, the outrage is more muted in general that I'd expect (or want) because most of the country is incapable of assessing risk and making informed judgements about how much risk is abated by which political/bureaucratic policy. The chance of another 9/11 is non-zero and little that we are doing is changing that. IMHO, the TSA is a complete waste of time and taxpayer's money.
 
Jelle Klap
Bartender
Posts: 1951
7
Eclipse IDE Java
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Pat Farrell wrote:
But its unlikely that what they did is criminal under US Law.

Poor wording on my part, perhaps, but US law doesn't really concern me.
I agree that the "threat of terrorism" has caused a very disconcerting shift in govenment policies that is eroding the freedom and privacy of citizens the world over - certainly not limited to the US.
And for what, the illusion of security? What was that Benjamin Franklin quote again: "They who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"?
 
Pat Farrell
Rancher
Posts: 4678
7
Linux Mac OS X VI Editor
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Jelle Klap wrote:Poor wording on my part, perhaps, but US law doesn't really concern me.


Well, US law is the only law that he could have broken. He was in the US, is a US citizen, and released US "secret" (or above) documents. If he didn't break any US laws, he is not, by definition, a criminal.

I love that quote. Its usually attributed to Ben Franklin, but I've never seen a serious citation of when he said it, or even what is the accurate wording.
 
chris webster
Bartender
Posts: 2407
32
Linux Oracle Postgres Database Python Scala
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
What should happen? I dunno, although I think he was courageous in being prepared to act on his own conscience and wreck his own life in the process. I certainly wouldn't have had the guts/naivety/stupidity (* delete according to personal bias) to do what he did in the name of conscience.

But you can be absolutely sure that whatever the US public might think, he is not going to get away lightly. Not because of what people might think about his individual actions, but because no government can afford to set a precedent whereby people who explicitly sign up to all kinds of obligations under the banner of "security" can simply disregard those obligations and publish whatever they find in the "Top Secret" files. The US government spent 10 years hounding a UK citizen who poked his nose around in their computers looking for UFO stories, they dropped Manning in a hole for 35 years, and they're probably just waiting for Assange to be extradited to Sweden so they can grab him off the Swedes. Why would they let Snowden get away with this?
 
Pat Farrell
Rancher
Posts: 4678
7
Linux Mac OS X VI Editor
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Very detailed, long article in The New Republic on the trio, Snowden, Assange and Greenwald. Traces their history and public writings before the NSA topic.

http://www.newrepublic.com/article/116253/edward-snowden-glenn-greenwald-julian-assange-what-they-believe

Of course, Snowden has not been tried, and Assange is still holed up in an embassy in Loundon to stay away from sexual assault charges, so its hard to know what they really believe.

Its clear to me that they are not white knights on shining horses out to save freedom and democracy.
 
Mike Simmons
Ranch Hand
Posts: 3028
10
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Pat Farrell wrote:I love that quote. Its usually attributed to Ben Franklin, but I've never seen a serious citation of when he said it, or even what is the accurate wording.


The earliest reference seems to be from November 11, 1755, a letter to the governor of Pennsylvania. See the second-to-last paragraph. "Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

A much earlier loose variant from the Poor Richard's Almanack, 1738: "Sell not virtue to purchase wealth, nor Liberty to purchase power."
 
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic