wood burning stoves 2.0*
The moose likes Web Services Certification (SCDJWS/OCEJWSD) and the fly likes additional element after soap:Body? Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » Web Services Certification (SCDJWS/OCEJWSD)
Bookmark "additional element after soap:Body?" Watch "additional element after soap:Body?" New topic
Author

additional element after soap:Body?

Himai Minh
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 29, 2012
Posts: 734
In MZ's version 5 notes on p.3, "An envelop must not have any element children of soap:Envelop following the soap:Body element".

Invalid example:

But on p.27,"SOAP 1.1 allows additional elements to follow the SOPABody element, SOAP 1.2 disallows these".

So, which statement is correct?
Frits Walraven
Creator of Enthuware JWS+ V6
Bartender

Joined: Apr 07, 2010
Posts: 1660
    
  25

p3 is talking about what is ok according to Basic Profile v1.1, not about what is allowed by the SOAP protocol.
Himai Minh
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 29, 2012
Posts: 734
This may be a good exam question:


So here are the correct options:
1. this envelop is not BP 1.1 compliant
2. this envelop is SOAP 1.1 compliant
3. this envelop is not SOAP 1.2 compliant

Frits Walraven
Creator of Enthuware JWS+ V6
Bartender

Joined: Apr 07, 2010
Posts: 1660
    
  25

Yeah, only that SOAP 1.2 is not part of the EE6 exam...
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: additional element after soap:Body?