aspose file tools*
The moose likes BEA/Weblogic and the fly likes WLS JMS ack options Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login

Win a copy of EJB 3 in Action this week in the EJB and other Java EE Technologies forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Products » BEA/Weblogic
Bookmark "WLS JMS ack options" Watch "WLS JMS ack options" New topic

WLS JMS ack options

Andrew Ao

Joined: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 16
Hi, i just had a sample test for wl 6.0 test from bea. i couldn't understand why the answer to the following question is D.
Which of the following JMS message acknowledgment options minimizes session overhead?
I thought WL has a proprietory acknowledge mode - NO_ACKNOWLEDGE, which doesn't require any acknowledgment after message delivery to client. so, i thought this should have less overhead than DUPS_OK_ACKNOWLEDGE.
thank you,
I agree. Here's the link:
subject: WLS JMS ack options
Similar Threads
Doubt on Enthuware mock regarding MDBs
JMS acknowledgement modes
Need help in MDB
JBoss Messanging: keeping message in inbox queue until it will be processed successfully - possible?
please answer this 128 questions for WLS. Urgently!