This week's book giveaway is in the Servlets forum.
We're giving away four copies of Murach's Java Servlets and JSP and have Joel Murach on-line!
See this thread for details.
The moose likes BEA/Weblogic and the fly likes WLS JMS ack options Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


Win a copy of Murach's Java Servlets and JSP this week in the Servlets forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Products » BEA/Weblogic
Bookmark "WLS JMS ack options" Watch "WLS JMS ack options" New topic
Author

WLS JMS ack options

Andrew Ao
Greenhorn

Joined: Sep 10, 2001
Posts: 16
Hi, i just had a sample test for wl 6.0 test from bea. i couldn't understand why the answer to the following question is D.
Which of the following JMS message acknowledgment options minimizes session overhead?
A. NO_ACKNOWLEDGE
B. AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE
C. CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE
D. DUPS_OK_ACKNOWLEDGE
I thought WL has a proprietory acknowledge mode - NO_ACKNOWLEDGE, which doesn't require any acknowledgment after message delivery to client. so, i thought this should have less overhead than DUPS_OK_ACKNOWLEDGE.
thank you,
-andrew
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: WLS JMS ack options
 
Similar Threads
please answer this 128 questions for WLS. Urgently!
JBoss Messanging: keeping message in inbox queue until it will be processed successfully - possible?
JMS acknowledgement modes
Doubt on Enthuware mock regarding MDBs
Need help in MDB