wood burning stoves 2.0*
The moose likes Scala and the fly likes What makes Scala different? Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Languages » Scala
Bookmark "What makes Scala different?" Watch "What makes Scala different?" New topic
Author

What makes Scala different?

Hussein Baghdadi
clojure forum advocate
Bartender

Joined: Nov 08, 2003
Posts: 3479

Hey,
James Gosling picked Scala as the second language for the JVM.
What does Scala bring to the VM?
AFAIK, it is a functional language that follows Erlang concurrency model.
Why James picked it in favour of Groovy, Jython, JRuby, JavaScript, Jaskell ...?
Thank you.
Pat Farrell
Rancher

Joined: Aug 11, 2007
Posts: 4646
    
    5

I don't know if he did it. But IMHO, the Java concurrency implementation is too hard for most programmers. So building on Erlang or other languages that hide all the concurrency thread control, synchronization, etc. is a good thing.

We need something to use the 8, 16, and 32 core processors that Intel has announced. Java isn't going to work, IMHO, because its just too hard to get the treading right
Garrett Rowe
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jan 17, 2006
Posts: 1296
In my experience you really have to dive in to see how a languages features affect the way that you write code. Different languages have different constructs that just do certain things well.

If you have little or no experience with functional programming, when you start of with Scala you'll probably find that you are writing your Scala code with a Java *accent*. But as you get more comfortable with the type system and the functional nature of some of the libraries, and as you start to make your classes immutable by default, and only mutable if the "have" to be (they never do!) then you'll get to see the real fun in Scala. By the time you make it up to implicit conversions and self typing, you'll be sold.

Or maybe you won't like it at all. That happens. After all the good things I heard about Ruby, I finally downloaded the interpreter and libraries and started writing code, I didn't really like it. No big deal. I'm not saying its not a worthy language that can do powerful things easily, I just didn't take to it. If I had to work somewhere that coded in Ruby, I wouldn't be miserable, but since I don't I looked for another language I liked using better.

I guess what I'm saying is jump in, see what the fuss is all about. If you have questions, come back and ask them here. Most of us are still in the learning phase, so we can learn together.


Some problems are so complex that you have to be highly intelligent and well informed just to be undecided about them. - Laurence J. Peter
 
It is sorta covered in the JavaRanch Style Guide.
 
subject: What makes Scala different?