I don't know if he did it. But IMHO, the Java concurrency implementation is too hard for most programmers. So building on Erlang or other languages that hide all the concurrency thread control, synchronization, etc. is a good thing.
We need something to use the 8, 16, and 32 core processors that Intel has announced. Java isn't going to work, IMHO, because its just too hard to get the treading right
Joined: Jan 17, 2006
In my experience you really have to dive in to see how a languages features affect the way that you write code. Different languages have different constructs that just do certain things well.
If you have little or no experience with functional programming, when you start of with Scala you'll probably find that you are writing your Scala code with a Java *accent*. But as you get more comfortable with the type system and the functional nature of some of the libraries, and as you start to make your classes immutable by default, and only mutable if the "have" to be (they never do!) then you'll get to see the real fun in Scala. By the time you make it up to implicit conversions and self typing, you'll be sold.
Or maybe you won't like it at all. That happens. After all the good things I heard about Ruby, I finally downloaded the interpreter and libraries and started writing code, I didn't really like it. No big deal. I'm not saying its not a worthy language that can do powerful things easily, I just didn't take to it. If I had to work somewhere that coded in Ruby, I wouldn't be miserable, but since I don't I looked for another language I liked using better.
I guess what I'm saying is jump in, see what the fuss is all about. If you have questions, come back and ask them here. Most of us are still in the learning phase, so we can learn together.
Some problems are so complex that you have to be highly intelligent and well informed just to be undecided about them. - Laurence J. Peter