This week's book giveaway is in the Design forum.
We're giving away four copies of Building Microservices and have Sam Newman on-line!
See this thread for details.
The moose likes JBoss/WildFly and the fly likes JMX   Vs   MC4J Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login

Win a copy of Building Microservices this week in the Design forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Products » JBoss/WildFly
Bookmark "JMX   Vs   MC4J" Watch "JMX   Vs   MC4J" New topic


raj vin

Joined: Mar 17, 2007
Posts: 12
How JBoss JMX (Management console) is different from the MC4J Management console ?
Henry Wong

Joined: Sep 28, 2004
Posts: 20057

MX4J is an implementation of JMX. And I believe the MC4J console is used for MX4J.

Anyway, if memory serves, JBoss uses the builtin (or reference) JMX implemention, but can be configured to use MX4J instead. And should run the same.

Not entirely sure, so please correct if wrong...

Books: Java Threads, 3rd Edition, Jini in a Nutshell, and Java Gems (contributor)
I’ve looked at a lot of different solutions, and in my humble opinion Aspose is the way to go. Here’s the link:
subject: JMX Vs MC4J
It's not a secret anymore!