This week's book giveaways are in the Refactoring and Agile forums.
We're giving away four copies each of Re-engineering Legacy Software and Docker in Action and have the authors on-line!
See this thread and this one for details.
Win a copy of Re-engineering Legacy Software this week in the Refactoring forum
or Docker in Action in the Cloud/Virtualization forum!
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

Functional Increments

 
Kalyan Raman
Greenhorn
Posts: 4
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi,
I need an ans for this question i found in 486.
When Scheduling project activities such as functional increments and test case development, which one of the following OOAD artifacts is the MOST useful?
a) Use cases
b) Interaction diagrams
c) Activity diagrams
d) Package diagrams
e) Class Diagrams
---------
With functional increments and test case development is it better to go by Interaction diagrams/Activity diagrams?
how different is activity diagram from an interaction diagram..
i have heard that Sequence and Interaction diagrams constitute Collobartion diagrams.Pls throw some light on this.
Thanks,
 
John Wetherbie
Rancher
Posts: 1449
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I'd say A, use cases. It is a common practice to group use cases into increments and have them drive test development.
When you say you found this in 486 I assume you mean a mock exam, right?
John
[This message has been edited by John Wetherbie (edited March 05, 2001).]
 
Kalyan Raman
Greenhorn
Posts: 4
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Yes i meant the mock exam in IBM's site
 
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic