my dog learned polymorphism
The moose likes OO, Patterns, UML and Refactoring and the fly likes UML and Constructors Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Engineering » OO, Patterns, UML and Refactoring
Bookmark "UML and Constructors" Watch "UML and Constructors" New topic

UML and Constructors

Paul Michael
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 02, 2001
Posts: 697
i was just wondering... do we have to put Constructors as part of Class Diagrams? if so, where? are they considered Operations?

SCJP 1.2 (89%), SCWCD 1.3 (94%), IBM 486 (90%), SCJA Beta (96%), SCEA (91% / 77%), SCEA 5 P1 (77%), SCBCD 5 (85%)
Deepak Arora

Joined: Jul 10, 2001
Posts: 26
if you See Larman diagrams, you will note that he has used message create() to instantiate a new object in the interaction diagram , actually every language has its own way of creating a new object, (e.g java instantiate with new operator) & UML can not provide any language dependent notation of creating new object therefore there is no notion of constroctor in UML(correct me UML gurus if i am mistaken)
Paul Michael
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 02, 2001
Posts: 697
thanks for the input Deepak! it's all coming back now.. i guess you're right! i remember using create in place of Constructors before and yep we got it from a book by Craig Larman. thanks again Deepak!
Desai Sandeep
Ranch Hand

Joined: Apr 02, 2001
Posts: 1157
That's correct!create() is a language-independent way to create a new instance of a class in UML.The message should be passed actually be passed to a class, but UML allows it to be passed to an instance.
The create() of UML gets translated to language-dependent syntax of OO language(for example, new operator in Java)
-- Sandeep
[This message has been edited by Desai Sandeep (edited July 11, 2001).]
I agree. Here's the link:
subject: UML and Constructors
jQuery in Action, 3rd edition