aspose file tools*
The moose likes OO, Patterns, UML and Refactoring and the fly likes Can somebody explain this? Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


Win a copy of Spring in Action this week in the Spring forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Engineering » OO, Patterns, UML and Refactoring
Bookmark "Can somebody explain this?" Watch "Can somebody explain this?" New topic
Author

Can somebody explain this?

Ram Dhan Yadav K
Ranch Hand

Joined: Aug 13, 2001
Posts: 321
Hi,
this is an IBM sample test question:
16) In design #1, the Catalog object has a getProducts() method, which returns a collection object, such as a Dictionary or array, containing all the Products the company sells. In design #2, the Catalog object has a getProductNumbered(anIdentifier) method, which returns the Product with the specified unique identifier. Considering the objects returned, which of the following BEST characterizes the two designs?
a) Both designs maintain the objects' encapsulation and reduce coupling by accessing state data via methods only and not directly.
b) Both designs break the objects' encapsulation, adding brittle coupling.
c) Design #1 breaks the encapsulation of the Catalog, adding brittle coupling. Design #2 maintains the encapsulation of the Catalog, making future design changes easier.
Why is the answer C. Why not B. How can we improve this design?


Ram Dhan Yadav (SCJP, SCWCD, SCJA-I, IBM EC(483))
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit."
Balbir Singh
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jun 01, 2001
Posts: 79
Hi Ram,
Check this Thread


Thanks and Regards<br />Balbir Singh<br />Sun Certified Java Programmer<br />IBM Certified Administrator for WebSphere4.0
Pho Tek
Ranch Hand

Joined: Nov 05, 2000
Posts: 761

(a) is not correct. Accessing state data via methods only does not gurantee encapsulation. If the object being returned is not immutable (read-only); then the client program calling those methods may be able to modify the state of Catalog.
Now we're left with (b) & (c). (b) came out
second BEST because the statement doesn't say
which object's encapsulation was broken.
In (c), it clearly said it wanted to know which
design broke the encapsulation of Catalog. Under
that context, design #1 is the culprit as it lost
control of its aggregates by returning them to
client. e.g. The client has to write its own
code to traverse the collection looking for
a particular product when searching for products
is clearly a responsibility of catalog.
Looking at the design issues from a bigger picture; it doesn't really mean that design #1
is to be avoided. Just look at javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest which has
these methods:

Pho
[ March 08, 2002: Message edited by: Pho Tek ]

Regards,

Pho
Ram Dhan Yadav K
Ranch Hand

Joined: Aug 13, 2001
Posts: 321
Thanks Balbir and Pho,that helps a lot!
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: Can somebody explain this?