File APIs for Java Developers
Manipulate DOC, XLS, PPT, PDF and many others from your application.
The moose likes OO, Patterns, UML and Refactoring and the fly likes Command pattern vs Session Facade Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Engineering » OO, Patterns, UML and Refactoring
Bookmark "Command pattern vs Session Facade" Watch "Command pattern vs Session Facade" New topic

Command pattern vs Session Facade

Kelly Vista

Joined: Jan 21, 2005
Posts: 2

I am debating using the Command pattern as my primary strategy for implementing my J2EE enterprise app business logic and would like some advice.

NOTE: The Command pattern does have some similarity to the TransactionScript and Strategy patterns, I believe.

Here's my idea: I would like to have only a few types of abstract commands (such as a NonTransactionalCommand, a TransactionalCommand) and implement each use case in my app as an instance of one of these abstract commands. For example, I might have a command called GetProductListCommand which is a NonTransactionalCommand and returns the list of products available (i.e., has a getProducts() method) when execute()'d.

My design also includes stateless session beans with an execute() interface (i.e,. they act as the CommandProcessor). No entity beans (will use Hibernate) and may very well eventually implement a Message bean interface with a similar executeAsynchronously() type method, if eventually necessary.

I guess the popular alternative (or, more correctly, the norm) is to implement session facades for handling most enterprise business logic.

However, I am attracted to the Command pattern because of its simplicity, it's rapid application development angle, its disconnected-ness from EJB (e.g., a modification to a command does not mean touching any EJB at all, just the command class), and the ability for implementing cross-cutting features (such as transactions or security, although I also plan to use an AOP solution at the POJO level). At the same time, it works as a delegate of an EJB, so it's accessible for all kinds of network clients.

I am also familiar with it's drawbacks (e.g., maintainability for large numbers of commands, per the literature, such as the Marinescu 2002 EJB Patterns book).

So, very few types of stateless session beans (though there may be many instances) -- mainly there for remote client acceessibility and the ability to leverage application-level transactions if needed.

Nevertheless, I have never tried the command pattern approach and was curious if others had feedback or case studies.

Best regards --
I agree. Here's the link:
subject: Command pattern vs Session Facade
It's not a secret anymore!