Rahesh Kumar

Ranch Hand
+ Follow
since Sep 10, 2004
Merit badge: grant badges
For More
Cows and Likes
Cows
Total received
0
In last 30 days
0
Total given
0
Likes
Total received
0
Received in last 30 days
0
Total given
0
Given in last 30 days
0
Forums and Threads
Scavenger Hunt
expand Ranch Hand Scavenger Hunt
expand Greenhorn Scavenger Hunt

Recent posts by Rahesh Kumar

Paul/Sathish,

Thanks a lot for your responses....



14 years ago
Hi,

I have started to learn Flex and have a query regarding it. I came to know after going through the basics that FLex converts the code (Action scripts and mxml) to swf file which can be ran directly in the client side. can you please let me know while packaging the delivery for clients, is it enough if we send only these generated swf files? I may be wrong in my understanding, Kindly correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks for your help in advance

Regards,
Rahesh
14 years ago
Hey,

Thanks. I was hoping so. Then why is that so specifically named Object Oriented Javascript
Thanks. I will not use Reg any more. Thanks for pointing it out.
Hi,

How does the Object Oriented Javascript differ from Normal Javascript? Does it in anyway use Ajax internally?
[ August 27, 2008: Message edited by: Bear Bibeault ]

Originally posted by madhavi mahi:
Hi All,

Please let me know (If anybody have attended an interview in [ company X ])what type of questions will be asked in [ company X ] for 2+ years experienced in java & J2EE.

Thanks,
Madhavi

[ April 08, 2008: Message edited by: Ulf Dittmer ]



@Madhavi!

Ulf is right! Company specific discussions are not entertained here. Please adhere to it.

On an overall note, for a candidate with 2+ years of experience, the interviewers may ask the candidate to give them a walkthrough of the previous project architecture, and from there may put few questions on how things are done.

They may also want to test concepts like abstraction, inheritance etc.

MVC is most probably a competent contestant. All you need to do is to prepare yourself for any kind of question.

Afterall, interview is a process to test you in what you know and not in what you do not know.

All the very best!
15 years ago
Thank you very much for selecting me.

Originally posted by Prad Dip:
Can someone pass me tutorial link. I could not see anything in the sun site.



Prad, try this link

Originally posted by Prad Dip:


Can you tell us the resosurces over which applets gain control over ? thanks



@Prad,

I am stating what I know of!

There are two models in which applets can be loaded.

1. Loaded from the network.
2. Loaded from the local file system.

"Files" could be one good example of the resource, over which the Applet can take control of. I do accept that fact that Applets cannot ordinarily take control over, or change the file system. They need to be loaded with certain policies. They are called "Signed applets".

Originally posted by Ulf Dittmer:

Careful now. There are two things called "plugin" in this context, and I'm almost certain that Stuart is asking about one (the Java-enabling plugin for web browsers), and you (Rahesh) are talking about the other one (the plugin for NetBeans that helps JavaFX development).

Note that the NetBeans plugin is not required for developing with JavaFX, nor is NetBeans itself (even though you could certainly get that impression from the OpenJFX web site). A regular Java 5 JDK is sufficient.




Okey! Here I go! It would have been better if I had done little re-phrasing when I posted that reply!! Thanks Ulf, for pointing it out!

Originally posted by Ulf Dittmer:

I don't really see how. The Java client sandbox is rather more secure than executing JavaScript in a browser.



Well. At the time of execution, Applets can gain control to the client system's resources, which is little unsafe. In a broswer based application, once scripts and other necessary things are offloaded to the client environment, not the entire functional code.

I had this thoughtfrom some source. What would be the advantage in the security aspect, if it is a sandbox, rather than a browser?
@Stuart!

It doesn't need a plugin to run the JavaFX script, but it takes a plugin to develop JavaFX application!

Hope this helps!!
@Ulf,

Thanks! But on a lighter note, wouldn't the success depend on the marketing strategies too or in this case, "Promotion"?

Originally posted by Ulf Dittmer:
One of the aims of JavaFX (and of the "Consumer JRE") is to address some of the drawbacks of applets. It still makes sense to offload processing to the client; keeping a farm of servers that run web applications is expensive. So it depends on your perspective whether it's a good thing or a bad thing to run code on the client. What's not in doubt is that Java (applets or JavaFX) can provide a richer client environment than HTML/CSS/DOM/JavaScript.



@Ulf,

Thanks for replying! Though servers may prove costly to host the web application, offloading can be malicious and vulnerable too, IMHO.
Yeah!! When we see some sample implementation, JavaFX/Applets give some life to the web apps, which the rest of the technologies don't!

For the benefit of others
=========================

Ulf has thrown light on "Consumer JRE"! This is an update to the Java SE 6.
Refer this article for more information!!

Originally posted by Ulf Dittmer:
It's too early to tell which niche -if any- the various JavaFX technologies will come to occupy. There hasn't been formal release with a stable API yet, so nobody is yet using it on a large scale. Plus, JavaFX is a family of technologies (at least Sun has said that it will be), so there may be very different shapes of it yet to come.



@Ulf,

Agreed!

Mine was just an attempt to differentiate the web app and a standalone one. However, I think we should wait for the developer tools for the JavaFX to be released! Only then, we can get to know the entire family

Thanks!!