Originally posted by Kristof Janssens:
StartUp.main() looks at the flag:
[...]
- is it empty, a new client object is created and will show my connection panel, which allows the user to go in local or in network mode
Originally posted by Michael Valentino:
[...]
I have a feeling my installation is bad though, so on mondy I'm going to reinstall. Thanks for the help Scott, It was a bigger jump from WSAD 5.1.2 to RAD 6.0 than I had expected.
Originally posted by Raymond Ong:
Hi,
Of course I'm thinking worst case scenario. Are you saying that the messages cannot be corrupted? I need advice so I know where to properly put my validation. On my servlet or on the message-driven bean.
Thanks!
Originally posted by Vaithiya Sundaram:
Hi Tom,
I passed part1 exam last saturday with 91%.
Thanks a lot for your suggestions.
Vaithiya
Originally posted by Vaithiya Sundaram:
Thanks a lot Tom.
Your reply is very helpful.
Thanks
Vaithiya
Originally posted by Vaithiya Sundaram:
Thanks a lot Tom.
what kind of questions? like with given diagram point out what kind of diagram is this? or benefits of each diagram? or each part of each diagram how it works like that? is the below link is enought for UML? or should i go through UML distilled thoroughly?
http://community.borland.com/article/0,1410,31863,00.html
Thanks a lot again!
Vaithiya
Originally posted by Vaithiya Sundaram:
Congrats Tom,
I am planning to take this exam in few days.
Can you tell me your exam experience in more detail?
In EJB how the questions are asked? it is there at conceptual level?
or at programming level? how was the security,common architecture and design patterns?
Can you tell which particular area the questions come from?
Thanks
Vaithiya
Originally posted by Mahesh Pinnamaneni:
hai guys,
i just want to know when we include page directive what java classes are imported by default.(just like in java prgms we know that java.lang.* is imported automatically).
thanks & regards,
Mahesh
Originally posted by David Harkness:
If you'd like to stick with the base exceptions, however, then there's no point in wrapping FinderException -- which extends EJBException -- in an EJBException since it already is one.