• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

WSAD 5.x and Large J2EE Apps

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 12
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone has tips on improving the load time of a J2EE EAR file in WSAD 5.x.

Our EAR project has many referenced projects, and although most of them are in binary form, the load time, especially in debug mode, take a really long time; 5 minutes or more.

An IBM WSAD redbook mentioned manipulating the heap allocated to the WSAD server JVM and the workbench JVM as a way of fine tuning performance. But I had no luck doing so, in fact at one point the WSAD debugger stopped working correctly.

Anyway, I'd appreciate anyone information regarding large EAR files in WSAD.

Thanks,
Mohsen
 
author & internet detective
Posts: 41878
909
Eclipse IDE VI Editor Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Mohsen,
I'm not quite sure what you mean by "load time." Is this compile time? The time it takes to start the server?

The first thing that springs to mind is that it may be faster to keep the binary form projects as jars.
 
Mohsen Gamshad
Greenhorn
Posts: 12
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Thanks for the reply; I guess I wasn't clear enough.

The load time I am referring to is the time from when I select the ear project and chose "Debug on Server" until I get the "Open for business" message. This the time I am trying to reduce. The reason I am trying to reduce this time is that in a develop/debug environments, you can loose a considerable amount of time waiting for restarts of the debugger.

Also, the binary form projects are kept as jars. Mind you, the number of projects are in the hunderds (~400 or so). Even if I removed the stand alone projects and only kept the common components, I still have a considerable number of projects referenced in the EAR.

I'm going to be looking into the hot deployment feature in WSAD 5.1.2, but I was wondering if there are any other techniques out there.

Thanks,
Mohsen
 
Jeanne Boyarsky
author & internet detective
Posts: 41878
909
Eclipse IDE VI Editor Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Mohsen,
In WSAD 4, I recall that it was faster to start the server in debug mode and then try to run the EJB/web app. I'm not sure if this is still the case in 5, but it's worth a shot.
 
Mohsen Gamshad
Greenhorn
Posts: 12
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Thanks. I'll give it a try.
 
Mohsen Gamshad
Greenhorn
Posts: 12
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
In v5, debug mode takes longer to start than non-debug mode.

Mohsen
 
Jeanne Boyarsky
author & internet detective
Posts: 41878
909
Eclipse IDE VI Editor Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Mohsen,
Yes it does. This was actually the case in WSAD 4 as well. It's just that the time difference is larger in WSAD 5.
 
Mohsen Gamshad
Greenhorn
Posts: 12
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
In that case I am not sure if I understand your previous recommendation. Can you expand on that please? Also, I thought the EARs were bound to the server, how can I start the server without loading the EAR/WAR projects???

Thanks,
Mohsen
 
Jeanne Boyarsky
author & internet detective
Posts: 41878
909
Eclipse IDE VI Editor Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Mohsen,
When you start the server in either mode, it loads the EARs attached to it. In particular it binds the JNDI names, checks datasources, etc. After each step, it gives some of the memory back. At some point, it needs to run the EJB/WAR. At this point, the server loads the appropriate module and all dependencies.

By starting the server (along with the ear) and not explicitly requesting a module, you are putting a break between the two steps. This allows the JVM to reclaim some memory. That way by the time you do processing more memory is available. The less disk accesses/paging that occurs, the faster things go.

Everything I've said so far applies to debug mode or regular mode. It's just that debug mode uses a lot more memory. Therefore the effect is more prounounced. It may or may not be enough of a difference for your application. Try it. It doesn't cost anything and you may be surprised by the results!
 
Whatever you say buddy! And I believe this tiny ad too:
a bit of art, as a gift, that will fit in a stocking
https://gardener-gift.com
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic