• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Junilu Lacar
Sheriffs:
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Tim Cooke
  • Henry Wong
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • salvin francis
  • Frits Walraven
Bartenders:
  • Scott Selikoff
  • Piet Souris
  • Carey Brown

Difference between Linux and other flavored Unix (AIX, Solaris, HPUX)

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 121
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I have used all the commerial UNIX: AIX, HPUX, Solaris and
found little difference and no problem to do shell programming
and to run Unix commands.

What about Linux? What is the main difference as a user, not admin,
should know?
[ September 08, 2005: Message edited by: Glen Cai ]
 
High Plains Drifter
Posts: 7289
Netbeans IDE VI Editor
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Dorks like it better.
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 3061
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
From my perspective, there is little difference between the various flavors of Unix and Linux that I have used. So far, I have experience with Red Hat and Debian Linux, HP-UX, and Solaris. The main differences that I have found deal with command-line options for tools like tar, make, ps, ls, etc. For example, on my Debian system at home, I can type

tar -czf filename.tgz *

To create a zipped tar file. However, on the Solaris systems on campus, I have to do

tar -cf filename.tar * | gunzip

(or something like that) to get the same effect.

Layne
 
Saloon Keeper
Posts: 22483
151
Android Eclipse IDE Tomcat Server Redhat Java Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Solaris has a number of features appropriate to large servers running with load balancing, but commonly-used commands reflect Unix about 10 years ago. Or at least Solaris 8 did. I haven't spent enough time on 10 to pay attention.

In general, the Linux versions of these same commands have more amenities.

However, there's no "one" Linux (well, discounting what you get from kernel.org). RedHat and Debian stow distro-specific config information in different locations.

One thing I do appreciate about Linux over older Unixes is that the /etc directory is amost entirely text files, and they don't keep executables in it. Much tidier to maintain and manipulate.
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 139
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Originally posted by Michael Ernest:
Dorks like it better.



What does that mean?
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1923
Scala Postgres Database Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator


"The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48"
dork dork (d^ork), n.
1. a person who is stupid, socially inept, or ridiculous; --
always used disparagingly. slang.

Syn: nerd; jerk. PJC

2. the penis. vulgar slang
PJC

 
Layne Lund
Ranch Hand
Posts: 3061
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Originally posted by Deep Narsay:


What does that mean?



I think that, in his own unique way, Michael was trying that Linux seems to have a large following among power users. In the United States, someone that knows a lot about computers is often referred to by various slang terms: nerd, dork, geek, etc.

Layne
 
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic