Javaranch helped me a lot with many ideas. On the other hand it also caused me pain because whatever i did felt inadequate and i changed my design many times. I had around 20 classes - did not changed BDM much. Again i feel i could have elaborated a bit more, so 39 seems well justified Component diagram was divided in tiers - i made small silly mistake - no doubt caused me 3 marks there Seq diagram was very eloborate (in UML 2.0 where-ever possible). Most of it time was spent there (i had all exception cases and some extra cases which i thought can occur). So i am happy i got 12 there.
Congratulation Deepak, Good Sore! can you tell me what level of details did you have in your class diagram? did you have all the possible methods a class can have or at least all the methods that used in Sequence diagram?
Great score. I have been waiting for the results for 3 weeks. So I still have to be patient. Btw. how long were you waiting for the results ? Is it correct that my status for part II is : pending ? I hope so.
My classes had either all attributes or all methods based on entities or facades. Methods were listed based on sequence diagrams - but they were not 100% overlapping. I did not use any arguments in method in class diagram but did show some TO in sequence diagrams. I did stereotype my facades in class diagram based on what kind of session bean it will be. My guess is examiner is not looking for all possible methods but representative methods which will satisfy all the requirements. I waited for around 5 weeks for result.