Win a copy of Beginning Java 17 Fundamentals: Object-Oriented Programming in Java 17 this week in the Java in General forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Tim Cooke
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Ron McLeod
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
Sheriffs:
  • Junilu Lacar
  • Rob Spoor
  • Paul Clapham
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Holloway
  • Tim Moores
  • Jesse Silverman
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Carey Brown
Bartenders:
  • Al Hobbs
  • Piet Souris
  • Frits Walraven

A confused result

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 19
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
hi all:
See this code:
class Process {
byte b=127;

Process() {
this.methodA();
}

void methodA() {
System.out.println("Value of b is = " +b );
}

public static void main(String [] args) {
Processor p = new Processor();
}
}

class Processor extends Process {
byte b=126;

Processor() {
System.out.println("Value of b* = " + b);
}

void methodA() {
System.out.println("Value of b** = " + this.b);
}
}
The output is :
Value of b**= 0 //(1)
Value of b*= 126
I was confused why line (1) is 0 rather than 126?
Please help me.Thanks!
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 103
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
The problem is because the call to methodA in class Process calls methodA in Processor but variable b in Processor hasn't been initialized yet. The order of initialization is super class first then sub-class. Since your still in the super class constructor Java hasn't gotten to the point where variables in the sub-class have been initialized. By the timee you get to the metehod call in the sub-class constructor the sub-class variables have been initialized. That's why the second call to methodA prints 126.
 
Anon Ning
Greenhorn
Posts: 19
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Thanks Michael! I got it.
 
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic