posted 15 years ago
Hi Bal,
This sounds a little odd. If you have a <many-to-one> relationship within the child table, this would indicate that the parent table could have many children, and thus the relationship between the parent and the child should then be <one-to-many>.
Might be best if you could show us your mapping files. Or if you are not using mapping files, show us the two classes with the associated annotations.
Regards
Matt Gaunt