|
![]() |
If quitters never win, and winners never cheat, who's the idiot that said: Quit while you're ahead?
42
Originally posted by Jeroen Wenting:
But who am I? I think that the whole post counter thingy is way overblown, as is the constant "XXX hit YYY posts" thingy.
If we're not careful it will turn into a race to post as much as possible without consideration for quality, in other words a popularity contest with the most prolific poster winning out?[/QB]
If quitters never win, and winners never cheat, who's the idiot that said: Quit while you're ahead?
Author of Test Driven (2007) and Effective Unit Testing (2013) [Blog] [HowToAskQuestionsOnJavaRanch]
"I'm not back." - Bill Harding, Twister
How simple does it have to be???
Originally posted by Jim Yingst:
And I think you're the first person to call attention to this particular behavior. Others have noticed it, but not been too bothered by it (I think). So unless there's a sudden groundswell of support for post count reformation, I think fixing this "bug" will remain pretty low on the to do list here. No offense, that's just how I see it. Thanks for the input though, we do appreciate feedback on this sort of thing.
If quitters never win, and winners never cheat, who's the idiot that said: Quit while you're ahead?
if you don't know, then ask. if you do know, then share. love is knowledge.
Associate Instructor - Hofstra University
Amazon Top 750 reviewer - Blog - Unresolved References - Book Review Blog
Originally posted by Thomas Whalen:
I think that post counts result in nothing but senseless posts.
If quitters never win, and winners never cheat, who's the idiot that said: Quit while you're ahead?
Politics n. Poly "many" + ticks "blood sucking insects". Tiny ad:
a bit of art, as a gift, the permaculture playing cards
https://gardener-gift.com
|