• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Ron McLeod
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Paul Clapham
Sheriffs:
  • Tim Cooke
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Junilu Lacar
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • fred rosenberger
  • salvin francis
Bartenders:
  • Piet Souris
  • Frits Walraven
  • Carey Brown

Dan's questions

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 97
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Question 26
abstract class A {
private int x = 4;
private int y = 2;
public int x() {return x;}
public void x(int x) {this.x = x;}
public int y() {return y;}
public void y(int y) {this.y = y;}
}
interface B {int math();}
class C {
static class D extends A implements B {
public int math() {return x()+y();}
}
static A a1 = new A() implements B {
public int math() {return x()+y();}
};
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.print(new C.D().math());
System.out.print(a1.math());
}}
What is the result of attempting to compile and run the program?
a. Prints: 12
b. Prints: 66
c. Compile-time error
d. Run-time error
e. None of the above
Answer = c because an anonymous class referenced by a1 : static A a1 = new A() implements B {cannot haven an implements clause !
I also thought a compile error but for even a different reason i.e. you cannot instantiate (Static A a1 =....)an abstract class (must be extended).
Is this true or am I wrong ?
Kristof
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1865
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Kristof,
The code does not attempt to instantiate an abstract class. Instead, the code attempts to create an instance of anonymous class that extends an abstract class. Since the anonymous class has no abstract methods, there would be no compile-time error due to the abstract modifier appearing in the superclass declaration.
Having said the above, I don't like my code example in that question, because it is too complex. I think I'll replace it with the following.


Kristoff, you can preserve the formatting of code block by using the UBB tage named "CODE". Just click the CODE button and then paste the program inside the tags.
 
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic