Win a copy of Spring Boot in Practice this week in the Spring forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Tim Cooke
  • Ron McLeod
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Paul Clapham
Sheriffs:
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Henry Wong
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Al Hobbs
  • Carey Brown
Bartenders:
  • Piet Souris
  • Mikalai Zaikin
  • Himai Minh

inner class static or no?

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 4
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hello
look this question:
Which of the following statements are true?
1 An inner class may be declared private
2 An inner class may be declared static
3 An inner class defined in a method should always be anonymous
4 An inner class defined in a method can access all the method local variables
5 Construction of an inner class may require an instance of the outer class

Answer and Exp : 1, 2, and 5 are correct. Inner classes may be defined with any accessibility, so private is entirely acceptable and 1 is correct. Similarly, the static modifier is permitted on an inner class, which causes it not to be associated with any particularinstance of the outer class. This means that 2 is also correct. Inner classes defined in methods may be anonymous--and indeed often are--but this is not required, so 3 is wrong.4 is wrong because it is not possible for an inner class defined in a method to access the local variables of the method,except for those variables that are marked as final. Constructing an instance of a static inner class does
not need an instance of the enclosing object, but all non-static inner classes do require such a reference, n that reference must be available to the new operation.The reference to the enclosing object is commonly implied as this, which is why it is commonly not explicit. These points make 5 true.
But J2SE specification says:
"An inner class is a nested class that is not explicitly or implicitly declared static. "
"Inner classes include local, anonymous and non-static member classes "
So 2 is INCORRECT or no?
I guess that the exam uses the terms: Top-level nested classes and interfaces to refer to static members inside a class. And an inner class like instance members of others class.So a inner class can never be declared static, but a nested class must be declared static.
am I wrong or An inner class may be declared static? TO THE EXAM WHAT IS CORRECT? explain pls.
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 65
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I don't think you'll get a question on the real exam that
is based on that distinction (of terminology). If you should
happen to, I'd go with what the spec says...
FWIW, I don't remember any questions on my exam where that distinction would have made a difference.
 
With a little knowledge, a cast iron skillet is non-stick and lasts a lifetime.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic