programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
• Campbell Ritchie
• Paul Clapham
• Ron McLeod
• Tim Cooke
• Junilu Lacar
Sheriffs:
• Rob Spoor
• Devaka Cooray
• Jeanne Boyarsky
Saloon Keepers:
• Jesse Silverman
• Stephan van Hulst
• Tim Moores
• Carey Brown
• Tim Holloway
Bartenders:
• Jj Roberts
• Al Hobbs
• Piet Souris

# synchronized methods + Threads

Ranch Hand
Posts: 485
• Number of slices to send:
Optional 'thank-you' note:

1. i.v guaranteed always to be 0 or 1
2. j.v guaranteed always to be 0 or 1
3. k.v guaranteed always to be 0 or 1
4. j.v will always be greater than or equal to k.v at any given time.
5. k.v will always be greater than or equal to j.v at any given time.

Ranch Hand
Posts: 298
• Number of slices to send:
Optional 'thank-you' note:
I guess the answer should be both 1 and 2.
Whats the correct answer?

Parameswaran Thangavel
Ranch Hand
Posts: 485
• Number of slices to send:
Optional 'thank-you' note:
hi
can any please explain me

author
Posts: 23909
142
• Number of slices to send:
Optional 'thank-you' note:

Originally posted by Parameswaran Thangavel:
hi
can any please explain me

Let's look at the possible answers...

1. i.v guaranteed always to be 0 or 1
2. j.v guaranteed always to be 0 or 1
3. k.v guaranteed always to be 0 or 1
4. j.v will always be greater than or equal to k.v at any given time.
5. k.v will always be greater than or equal to j.v at any given time.

As for the methods, a() and b() are both synchronized. They can't be ran in parallel via different threads. The c() method is not synchronized, it can be ran in parallel, even while a() or b() is running.

(3) is not true as you can have two c() method running in parallel, and having increment the count before decrementing the count -- producing a value of 2. (albeit very short lived)

(4) is not true as a ramification of (3). K can have large values... In theory, hard to produce in practice.

(5) is not true based on how method b() works. It increments j before incrementing k... hence, j is larger than k for the really small period between the two methods.

Now that leaves (1) and (2) which is only modified from a() and b(), and which can only run via a single thread, and always runs in pairs, inc() followed by a dec().

Henry

 Don't get me started about those stupid light bulbs.