Frank:
I have debated alot about the "Objective" section.
- Do I want to say that I am "looking for
J2EE position" - or do I want to say "know OOA&D and experienced in UML and lifecycle and J2EE" ?
- I don't think there is a right or wrong answer here. I may re-hack the objective agan - but it worked ok in last 2 job searches.
-----
- I like to take a more pro-active approach to the job search. Meaning - I send out at most 5 to 10 resumes a week. And they are addressed to specific folks mentioned in advertisements. So when the resume gets to a desk - I want to make an instant impact - BAM!!!
- I look at it as another method of being different from the other guys. Figure that everyone else's resume looks the same. Mine is different - by virtue of the formatting alone - and I want to continue that difference in the Objective statement.
- You know - even after the initial screening - that there will be 30-40 resumes on the manager's desk (possible even more). I absolutely have to do whatever it takes to get his/her attention. So that's my reason for wording my objective this
way.
- I respond to any job that I think is interesting to me - does not matter where I saw the advertisement. But it must have a contact name/e-mail/number or else I don't count it as part of my 5 or 10 submitted resumes - even if I send one out to that company.
- I don't generally post my resume to a job-board and "hope for the best". It doesn't hurt- it's just that I don't count on it to generate leads.
- Also - I absolutely become a "pain in the rear-end" once I get a contact name and phone number. I absolutely make it my goal to score an on-site interview.
- If I were to use a "resume' rabbit" mass mailing - then I would definitely re-focus the Objective.
============
- Why do I want an on-site interview?
- My past experience has shown that I get offers 50-75% of the time when I do an on-site interview.
And that's what I want - 2 or 3 job offers in my hands.
- The 25% - 50% rejections are mainly due to no-show managers, or I plain just get disinterested (low pay - bad people - etc) and I think it shows.
----
- Note: The on-site success rate wasn't always this way. It's just by going through this job search process so many times that I got good at it. And I think that's what you gotta do in the game.
- And yeah - I have totally choked / panicked at an interview. Hate it when I loose my "train of thought". It happens.
Reason why you want to be going on multiple interviews per week -- at least one a week when the ball gets rolling.
-------------------
- The Hewlett-Packard section needs a total re-work. I had to up-date the resume in about 10 min after getting laid off from HP - as I had a solid job lead from an old friend and needed to get something out ASAP.
- I am working on SCWCD exam right now - plus the gym thing - and want to see how adding SCWCD plus the UML cert along with the SCJP2 cert will affect my responses.
- I can tell you that I am learning a whole heck of alot about JSP/Servlets just by studying for the SCWCD exam. I am approaching it more as a "learning tool" than as a "try to pass the exam exercise". That and the gym are the two reasons why I haven't been looking for awhile.
- I also want to see what effect loosing 120 lbs will have on my interview effort. Went from a size 50 to size 34 in past 18 months.
==================
Ok - it's getting late here. Gotta run.
Johnny
(jpcoxey@aol.com)