No. The question is why you need to retrieve all 2 million rows. It doesn't matter whether you retrieve them 1 at a time or 1,000 at a time. The whole idea is infeasible and user-hostile.
Originally posted by Pinik Tilli:
You all have same question why do i need to retrieve only 30 rows at one time. This was just an example. This number will be given by user, so this can be even in 100s. And i know very well that no one would sit and click "Next" many times.
So, i request you people to provide some solution rather than writing unnecessary stuff.
4. Rerun the query each time a user clicks next as you are doing, but this isn't performing well.
SELECT * FROM ( SELECT * FROM EMP, DEPT, LOC ORDER BY EMP.ENAME ) WHERE ROWNUM BETWEEN :1 and :2
Why do you think this won't perform
A good question is never answered.
Originally posted by Maria Smith:
Can some one help with my DB2 issue
Originally posted by seshu Palamanti:
Thanks for your suggestion Scott Selikoff but if we create a new query altogether the we would have to again start from the 1st Row of the Result and now not from 21000+1 th row of the result set.
I have a knack for fixing things like this ... um ... sorry ... here is a consilitory tiny ad:
how do I do my own kindle-like thing - without amazonhttps://coderanch.com/t/711421/engineering/kindle-amazon