Originally posted by HS Thomas: What is the best thing to come out of JMS without refeence to EJB or JDO's or POJOs. I suspect Message driven beans ? Anything else ?
If your are talking about the messages the are sent/received to/from message queue using JMS API, then the basic requirement is all those messages should implement javax.jms.Message interface. or if you are talking about the message listeners, that recieve the message. Then the client (listener) should implement MessageListener ... it could be a EJB (i mean MDB) or just a normal java class. Did I answer your question ?
Well speaking to my old boss (who is actually very young and is now back on the mothership) , he is now working with JMS with no EJBs. Are MDBs the only thing of importance in JMX? I assume the package is written in such a way that it is decouplable ? I can look at the JMS package and see how MQ-Series interfaces with it I suppose. Vinod John : Yes that helps enormously.
Aspects? I doubt it because the problem is not of structure but protocol. I really don't know what kind of programming libraries IBM provides for Notes, but I'd guess that if such a library is available, it's bound to be C/C++, not Java.
Actually no, we provide Java programming API's for Notes, and full integration with Notes for WebSphere. Do a google or Amazon search for "Domino programming with Java" and you'll find a bunch of hits. Kyle