• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Tim Cooke
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • paul wheaton
Sheriffs:
  • Ron McLeod
  • Devaka Cooray
  • Henry Wong
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Holloway
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Carey Brown
  • Tim Moores
  • Mikalai Zaikin
Bartenders:
  • Frits Walraven

Seven divides

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1907
1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
This problem is really killing me.See if you can solve.
Number formed by any set of integers repeating 6 times is always divisible by 7
Eg 1)111111 is divisible by 7
Eg 2)898989898989 is divisible by 7
Eg 3)307307307307307307 is divisible by 7
..................................
Eg 6)107451107451107451107451107451107451 is divisible by 7
..... and so on

Why this happens?
 
lowercase baba
Posts: 13091
67
Chrome Java Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
since 7 will divide 111111, it will divide any multiple of this, giving easy access to 222222, 333333, etc.

7 will also divide 101010101010, giving us all the 2digit numbers repeated 6 times.

same for 100100100100100100 and the 3 digit numbers.

now, is this a proof that it works for EVERY number repeated? no. but if we investigate a little further...

and look at how many times 7 goes into each of those, a pattern starts to develop...

111111/7 = 15873
101010101010/7 = 14430014430
100100100100100100/7 = 14300014300014300
100010001000100010001000 / 7 = 14287143000014287143000

that was as far as i went. not sure if this proves anything or not, or if it's a red herring. But it's interesting, imho
 
Arjun Shastry
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1907
1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I just got it.Its little lengthy but straight forward.I will post tomorrow.Waiting for others whether they can get using shortcuts.
(I will sleep now )
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1873
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi Arjun

I tried to prove it by Math Induction.

The idea is- if we have n-digit number repeating 6 times, that number can be given by,

NUMBER=a * Sigma of (b ^ i) where i=0 to 5
b = 10 ^ n
a = the number that is getting repeated 6 times.

e.g.
1. in 111111 , a = 1, b = 10 ^ 1
2. in 898989898989 , a = 89, b = 10 ^ 2
3. in 307307307307307307 , a = 307, b = 10 ^ 3 and so on...

now, by Math Induction,
Case 1: n =1
------------
NUMBER = a * Sigma (10 ^ i) where i = 0 to 5
=> NUMBER = a * 111111

Which is divisible by 7,

Case 2: Assume for n=k statement is true i.e.
---------------------------------------------
NUMBER = a * Sigma (10 ^ (k*i) ) where i = 0 to 5
is divisible by 7

Case 3: For n=k+1 we have,
--------------------------
NUMBER = a * Sigma (10 ^ ((k+1)*i) ) where i = 0 to 5
=> NUMBER = a * Sigma (10 ^ (k*i + i) )
=> NUMBER = 10* a * Sigma (10 ^ (k*i))
=> NUMBER = 10 * a * NUMBER_FOR_(n=k)

and From case-2 we know NUMBER_FOR_(n=k) is divisible by 7 hence the current NUMBER is also divisible by 7...

Well, this is quite simple approach but I don't know how to validate if Math Induction is really applicable here. I know in some cases we can't apply Math Induction. e.g. To prove that Person having many hair on head is bald

So any mathematician might want to explain this from pure math perspective..

Regards,
Maulin
 
Arjun Shastry
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1907
1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I think that should work.My approach was different.
Let N = 444444
Then N = 4*Math.pow(10,5) + 4*Math.pow(10,4) + 4*Math.pow(10,3) + 4*Math.pow(10,2) + 4*Math.pow(10,1) + 4*Math.pow(10,0)

Now write 10 as 7+3
so N = = 4*Math.pow(7+3,5) + 4*Math.pow(7+3,4) + 4*Math.pow(7+3,3) + 4*Math.pow(7+3,2) + 4*Math.pow(7+3,1) + 4*Math.pow(7+3,0)
If we expand using binomial theorem,then 7 will be in all terms except few terms.Those terms will be Math.pow(3,5),Math.pow(3,4)....
so N = (many things in which 7 is a factor)+[4*Math.pow(3,5)+4*Math.pow(3,4) +4*Math.pow(3,3) +4*Math.pow(3,2) +4*Math.pow(3,1) +4*Math.pow(3,0)]
Let E be the expression in square bracket.
E = 4*(Math.pow(3,5)+Math.pow(3,4)+Math.pow(3,3)+Math.pow(3,2)+Math.pow(3,1)+Math.pow(3,0))
As you can see,its a geometric progression.
1+3+Math.pow(3,2)+Math.pow(3,3)+...........
Sn in above case for 6 terms will be,
Sn = 1*(Math.pow(3,6)-1)/(3-1)

When three digits will be repeated 6 times,
Sn = 1*Math.pow(3,18)-1)/(3-1)
In short,
Sn = 1*Math.pow(3,6m)-1)/2----------(1)where m>=1
now,to prove Math.pow(3,6m)-1 is divisible by 7, we can use induction.
For m = 1,its Math.pow(3,6)-1 which is divisible by 7-----(2)
Let it be true for m = k
so Tk = Math.pow(3,6k)-1 is divisible by 7------(3)
Now Tk+1 = Math.pow(3,6(k+1))-1
= Math.pow(3,6k+6)-1
= (Math.pow(3,6k))*Math.pow(3,6) - 1
= (Math.pow(3,6k))*Math.pow(3,6) - 1 +Math.pow(3,6)-Math.pow(3,6)
= Math.pow(3,6){Math.pow(3,6k)-1} + Math.pow(3,6)-1
By (3),left term is divisible by 7 and Math.pow(3,6)-1 is divisble by 7
Hence Tk+1 is divisible by 7
Hence expression E is divisible by 7
Hence number N is diisible by 7.
 
Fire me boy! Cool, soothing, shameless self promotion:
Gift giving made easy with the permaculture playing cards
https://coderanch.com/t/777758/Gift-giving-easy-permaculture-playing
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic