Win a copy of Modern JavaScript for the Impatient this week in the Server-Side JavaScript and NodeJS forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Junilu Lacar
Sheriffs:
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Tim Cooke
  • Henry Wong
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • salvin francis
  • Frits Walraven
Bartenders:
  • Scott Selikoff
  • Piet Souris
  • Carey Brown

For all of you conspriacy theorists out there...

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 3244
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Check this site out....
If the pictures are not doctored and all of the facts that they quote are true then it is fairly interesting...
http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero13/pentagone/erreurs_en.htm

And let's just keep the discussion to the website listed not get into a whole new debate of the related events and the entire religious/political circumstances.
Any deviation from that and I'll delte the entire topic.
Fell free to bring up all of your other theories too -- area 51, Kennedy assasination, Roswell, etc
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 479
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Is it new to you?
Here people are talking about it for long (news, newspaper,...). And general Lemnitzer case is going out again...
 
Sheriff
Posts: 6450
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Can you explain how a Boeing 757-200, weighing nearly 100 tons and travelling at a minimum speed of 250 miles an hour* only damaged the outside of the Pentagon?
The Pentagon was built/reinforced to withstand a nuclear attack. And it didn't exactly damage only the outside of the Pentagon, but the outer rings of the Pentagon.
Can you explain how a Boeing 14.9 yards high, 51.7 yards long, with a wingspan of 41.6 yards and a cockpit 3.8 yards high, could crash into just the ground floor of this building?
Looks to me like it hit between the first three floors.
You'll remember that the aircraft only hit the ground floor of the Pentagon's first ring. Can you find debris of a Boeing 757-200 in this photograph?
I'm not sure the statement about only hitting the ground floor is correct. As far as debris, according to Battalion Chief Mike Tamillow of the Fairfax County, VA Fire and Rescue Department:
On arrival, the team found the five-acre grassy area in front of the Pentagon covered with plane wreckage.
"It was totally strewn, but I saw no piece of debris bigger than my hand," Tamillow said.

Back to the conspiracy site:
Can you explain why the Defence Secretary deemed it necessary to sand over the lawn, which was otherwise undamaged after the attack?
My best guess is to allow heavy equipment to be able to traverse the lawn area without getting stuck.
Can you explain what happened to the wings of the aircraft and why they caused no damage?
Most likely they disintegrated. Wings are not particularly sturdy things relative to the rest of the airframe. However if you look close at the picture you will see two points on either side of the central impact point (near ground level)that match up to the silouette and are very possibly the wing impact points.
Can you explain why the County Fire Chief could not tell reporters where the aircraft was?
Aircraft debris are commented on in the link I posted previously. Tamillow remarked on the intensity of the blaze due to all the jet fuel that had not burned in flight: There was also massive fire suppression going on. The plane had burned virtually no fuel, Tamillow said, because it had come only about 40 miles from the Dulles airport.
Back to the conspiracy:
Can you find the aircraft's point of impact?
The smoke in that particular photo makes it difficult, however the impact point can be pretty clearly seen in photos once the smoke clears.
Personally, a good friend of mine responded there as a firefighter and remarked on the smell of jet fuel at the scene (which as a former Army Airborne soldier he should be familiar with).
A friend of a person who I work with was on the Capital Beltway near the Pentagon and saw the plane hit. There have also been numerous local eyewitnesses who saw the plane hit. In addition they recently released security camera footage that showed the plane hitting.
When I was in the USAF I'd spoken with people who went on crash recovery. According to them, there isn't always much left of the plane once it crashed. So personally, I have no problem with the notion that there isn't much left of the aircraft.
Conspiracies are fun and all, but this one just doesn't hold up.
[ April 17, 2002: Message edited by: Jason Menard ]
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 3271
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

If the pictures are not doctored...


This reminded me of the classic "Bert is Evil" theory, which I always found quite entertaining. For those of you unfamiliar with the children's show Sesame Street, I'm sorry if you don't find this hilarious.
Corey
[ April 17, 2002: Message edited by: Corey McGlone ]
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 2823
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
The earth is flat and I have posted numerous web sites to prove it.
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1871
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
People also say that there no spaceship has ever gone to the moon, all that was dramatically picturised in the dessert and I've also seen people giving the evidence for that in Discovery Channel, but I dont beleive all that rubbish
 
High Plains Drifter
Posts: 7289
Netbeans IDE VI Editor
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 15304
6
Mac OS X IntelliJ IDE Chrome
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Originally posted by Sameer Jamal:
People also say that there no spaceship has ever gone to the moon, all that was dramatically picturised in the dessert and I've also seen people giving the evidence for that in Discovery Channel, but I dont beleive all that rubbish


Have you ever notices the camera angle(s) when Armstrong is stepping out of the capsule onto the surface of the "moon"? If he was the first to set foot then did he get out, mount the camera, start recording, then climb back into the capsule and climb out again?
I don't necessarily believe we NEVER set foot on the moon. I just have doubts as to Armstrong and that mission being the first. Weren't we in a race with the Russians? Oh, I forgot, Americans never cheat. )
 
Don't get me started about those stupid light bulbs.
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic