• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Ron McLeod
  • Rob Spoor
  • Tim Cooke
  • Junilu Lacar
Sheriffs:
  • Henry Wong
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
Saloon Keepers:
  • Jesse Silverman
  • Tim Holloway
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Moores
  • Carey Brown
Bartenders:
  • Al Hobbs
  • Mikalai Zaikin
  • Piet Souris

Uniqueness of objects

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 52
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I've always assumed that if you call new(Classname) on two separate occasions, you get two distinct objects, which will never be == to each other. In chasing down a recent bug, though, it appears that this isn't always the case.
The class which I created is called Rational. It looks something like this:
public class Rational {
int num;
int denom;
public Rational (int n, int d) {
num = n;
denom = d;
}
/* The obvious accessors .... */
}
If I call
Rational a = new Rational (0, 1);
Rational b = new Rational (0, 1);
Then I find that (a == b) is true!!
If I then call a.setNum (2), (a == b) is no longer true.
It appears that the JVM is doing some very strange optimization. (I'm using the Sun JDK 1.4.2 on Windows; I haven't tested this on other platforms.)
The == test makes a difference because I'm using Rational leaf nodes in a JTree, and using an == test to locate a child relative to its parent.
Could this have something to do with a Rational being a very small object, which can in principle be stored in just 64 bits?
 
Bartender
Posts: 9626
16
Mac OS X Linux Windows
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I can't duplicate it.

Results:
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 2937
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
It appears that the JVM is doing some very strange optimization. (I'm using the Sun JDK 1.4.2 on Windows; I haven't tested this on other platforms.)
I am also using 1.4.2 under Windows, but I cannot reproduce your problem. Can you reduce your class to an absolute minimum and post your complete test code?
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 5093
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
should be the case only if the Objects you're creating are Strings that are initialised to String literals containing the same literal.
Like
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic