Win a copy of Microservices Testing (Live Project) this week in the Spring forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Tim Cooke
  • Ron McLeod
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Paul Clapham
Sheriffs:
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Henry Wong
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Al Hobbs
  • Carey Brown
Bartenders:
  • Piet Souris
  • Mikalai Zaikin
  • Himai Minh

Operator Precedence & Associativity

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 11
Netbeans IDE Oracle Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I had a question about the result of this code from Mughal's Java Cert book (problem 3.17 p74)
public class Logic{
public static void main( String args[]){
int i = 0;
int j = 0;
boolean t = true;
boolean r;
r= (t & 0<(i+=1));
r= (t && 0<(i+=2));
r= (t | 0<(j+=1));
r= (t || 0<(j+=2));
System.out.println(i + " "+j);
}
}
Select all valid answers.
(a) The first digit printed is 1.
(b) The first digit printed is 2.
(c) The first digit printed is 3.
(d) The second digit printed is 1.
(e) The second digit printed is 2.
(f) The second digit printed is 3.
According to the answer in the back of the book, the correct answers are (c) and (d). I understand how the shortcircuited and logical operators work, but since "i+=" and "j+=" are in parenthesis, wouldnt they be executed first in each expression/line, making the correct answers (c) and (f)... I guess im getting the left to right associativity confused with the precedence.
Can anyone clarify this?
Thanks
Chad
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 18944
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
This seems to be the problem line: r= (t || 0<(j+=2));
For any expression 'X || Y', subexpression Y isn't evaluated at all if subexpression X happens to be true, no matter whether or not subexpression Y is parenthesized. So, if 't' happens to be true (which it is), expression '0 < '(j+=2) will not be evaluated.
For completeness, for any epxression 'X && Y', subexpression Y isn't evaluated at all if subexpression X happens to be false.
kind regards
 
With a little knowledge, a cast iron skillet is non-stick and lasts a lifetime.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic