Michael Mraz wrote:23 times faster is good, right?
Stephan van Hulst wrote:Sorry about that. I'll mention my solutions only after the puzzle for the next day has been released.
Piet Souris wrote:Some members are not only extremely speedy, but have code that is even shorter than Scala. Amazing.
Stephan van Hulst wrote:It's tougher than the puzzles before for sure. I battled a bit with the first part, but the second part was comparatively much easier.
Frits Walraven wrote:It must be good fun.
Liutauras Vilda wrote:...currently it doesn't look very complicated
Frits Walraven wrote:Although I haven't looked at the puzzles, but I just enjoy reading your posts. It must be good fun.
All of you deserve a Cow!
Tim Cooke wrote:I wonder how Michael "I'm not a software engineer by trade but is kicking all our butts" Mraz found today's day 6 puzzle?
Michael Mraz wrote:Say 7 is beginning on a [ur=https://xkcd.com/323/l]Balmer Curve[/url] with the intention of making top 200 for part 1. Wish me luck.
Tim Cooke wrote:Jeepers that was hard work! Satisfying to get all of Day 7 done though.
Michael Mraz wrote:a combination of "That logic makes sense" and "WTF does that do?"
Tim Cooke wrote:Day 8 . . . Straight forward enough, and even quite happy with the solution design too which is a rare thing.
Liutauras Vilda wrote:Watch my beauty:
machines help you to do more, but experience less. Experience this tiny ad:
ScroogeXHTML - small and flexible RTF to HTML converter libraryhttps://coderanch.com/t/710903/ScroogeXHTML-RTF-HTML-XHTML-converter