This week's book giveaway is in the JavaScript forum.
We're giving away four copies of Svelte and Sapper in Action and have Mark Volkmann on-line!
See this thread for details.
Win a copy of Svelte and Sapper in Action this week in the JavaScript forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Junilu Lacar
Sheriffs:
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Tim Cooke
  • Henry Wong
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • salvin francis
  • Frits Walraven
Bartenders:
  • Scott Selikoff
  • Piet Souris
  • Carey Brown

Creating own generic types

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 47
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi friends,



can we use super keyword instead of extends in the line 1.

Thanks in advance,
Mahes
 
Java Cowboy
Posts: 16084
88
Android Scala IntelliJ IDE Spring Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
What happened when you tried? What do you think it would mean if you would use 'super' instead of 'extends' there?
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 52
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi Maheswaran!

well, you can use super but for that you got to have a reason ( i mean you got to have some superclass which is extended or implemented by Animal directly or indirectly)..

if you replace the extends word with super in line 1 here, then you cannot declare an AnimalHolder reference (here, in line 4) which is of the type Dog, because Dog is not the supertype of Animal
 
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic