[Bollywood] Need KANK Review!!

[Chetan Parekh]

Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna
Dharma Production

[Vikram Kohli]

i have'nt watched it yet,but few of my friends who watched it says "Karan Johar again made a shit".

They says nothing new in this movie.

[Manish Hatwalne]

Overall pathetic and quite a drag.....brilliant in pieces though. Good performances by Amitabh, Abhishek, Preity Zinta & Rani Mukharji -- Shahrukh is loud as usual!

- Manish

[Badriprasad Bumbabol]

Try this one :

http://sharadslife.blogspot.com/2006/08/kank-kabhi-alvida-naa-kehna-magic-is.html

[Rajah Nagur]

Unfortunately I watched it on Monday night. The movie started at 10PM and got over 1:30 AM.
Man..the movie is too long...toooo long.

First half is watchable..second half sucks big time.
Abhishek is best and exceptional, Rani's character does not make any sense, Priety is fine, Amitabh is good, Sharukh is noisy, become old and become irritating. His loverboy image does not fit here.

The script is weak...no not weak there is no script..just some infidelity from Rani

Not worth to go to a theater to watch it...get a dvd at home..believe me you will use that forward button of the remote control too often.

If at all you are forced to go to the theater..drink plenty of booze..and fantasize all the cool babes Amitabh (dude) hangs around...that is the only good part

[Chetan Parekh]

Originally posted by Rajah Nagur:

...
...

Not worth to go to a theater to watch it...get a dvd at home..
...
...

First they make this kind of movie, so people don�t go to theater and purchase pirated DVD and watch at home. Directly they are supporting piracy by making such kind of movies.
[ August 16, 2006: Message edited by: Chetan Parekh ]

[Ulf Dittmer]

Originally posted by Chetan Parekh:
Directly they are supporting piracy by making such kind of movies.

How do you figure that? Who is forcing anyone to buy pirated stuff? It's always a conscious choice.

Besides, if a movie isn't worth the price of admission to a theater, then it's not worth to spend two hours time to watch it at all, IMO.

[Chetan Parekh]

Originally posted by Ulf Dittmer:


How do you figure that? Who is forcing anyone to buy pirated stuff? It's always a conscious choice.

Besides, if a movie isn't worth the price of admission to a theater, then it's not worth to spend two hours time to watch it at all, IMO.

Hey UD, it was a joke. Sorry I forgot to add smily - I have added now.

[Shaan Shar]

Originally posted by Chetan Parekh:
[Q]

Hey UD, it was a joke. Sorry I forgot to add smily - I have added now.[/Q]

Hey Ulf,

I hope now this time you should change your screen name... it's becoming now.."UD".

As chetan called you....

So what do you say now.....

Chetan: Anyways you really called a very cool name of Ulf... (UD)....
Left-Right-Left.....

[Sumit Chopra]

I can't tolerate Shah rukh khan. In his every film its the same. He would cry so much as if the ganges flow inside him.

And now watch him in Don. I'm sure it will be full of hamming and over acting.

[Vikram Kohli]

Reviews of KANK :-IT style

1. The program *KANK* has not been built as per the Functionality
Design Specifications (script).

2. The director should have first created a proper Design Document
(screenplay) and then begun the actual coding.

3. *AmitabhBachchan* is a powerful class with a number of methods and
functions but it has not been effectively used.

4. *AbhishekBachchan,* a derived class of *AmitabhBachchan*, inherits
all the attributes and properties of its parent class.

5. *ShahRukhKhan* and *RaniMukherjee* are emotionally overloaded and
go into an infinite weeping loop every 60 milliseconds.

6. The methods such as *Songs()* and *Cinematography()* have been
properly executed and produce fantastic results.

7. *PreityZinta* is an abstract class, which looks pretty but actually
does nothing.

8. Functions like *ArjunRampal, JA, and KD* pass NULL values and are
redundant.

9. The program takes an unbearably long time to terminate? about 3
hours and 20 minutes.

10. Overall, the package is not worth purchasing. You may opt for
pirated copies, though.

[ankur rathi]

Originally posted by Vikram Kohli:
Reviews of KANK :-IT style

1. The program *KANK* has not been built as per the Functionality
Design Specifications (script).

2. The director should have first created a proper Design Document
(screenplay) and then begun the actual coding.

3. *AmitabhBachchan* is a powerful class with a number of methods and
functions but it has not been effectively used.

4. *AbhishekBachchan,* a derived class of *AmitabhBachchan*, inherits
all the attributes and properties of its parent class.

5. *ShahRukhKhan* and *RaniMukherjee* are emotionally overloaded and
go into an infinite weeping loop every 60 milliseconds.

6. The methods such as *Songs()* and *Cinematography()* have been
properly executed and produce fantastic results.

7. *PreityZinta* is an abstract class, which looks pretty but actually
does nothing.

8. Functions like *ArjunRampal, JA, and KD* pass NULL values and are
redundant.

9. The program takes an unbearably long time to terminate? about 3
hours and 20 minutes.

10. Overall, the package is not worth purchasing. You may opt for
pirated copies, though.

One more to add in list:

Behaviour of Rani Mukherjee is not well defined.

[Chetan Parekh]

There is a story in newspaper that a husband killed his wife to marry other woman, after seeing KANK. Director Karan Jhohar had to give clarification on the theme/messange of the movie.

[Amit Agrawal]

Originally posted by Chetan Parekh:
There is a story in newspaper that a husband killed his wife to marry other woman, after seeing KANK. Director Karan Jhohar had to give clarification on the theme/messange of the movie.

yeah...details are here

[Chetan Parekh]

I got following SMS...

What’s the similarity between Bin Laden and KANK?
Both are torturing us nowadays.