• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

Who is going to buy Sun microsystems?

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 398
Android Eclipse IDE Ubuntu
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi,

IBM withdraws $7 Billion offer for Sun Microsystems.... It's good as well as bad. Good for Java professionals and bad for Sun.

Just thinking, who is going to buy Sun Microsystems?



 
Bartender
Posts: 9626
16
Mac OS X Linux Windows
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Mourouganandame Arunachalam wrote:
Just thinking, who is going to buy Sun Microsystems?



Woah! I totally derailed this discussion. Let's do this: Humorous suggestions over here in MD, serious discussion in this topic.
 
Saloon Keeper
Posts: 27851
196
Android Eclipse IDE Tomcat Server Redhat Java Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
After careful meditation, I've decided that if SOMEBODY has to to it, I'd rather it be Cisco. But that's just the best of a set of bad alternatives.

IBM owns too much of Java already.
Microsoft owns too much of Everything Else and wants to tie it all irretrievably to Windows. Besides MS and Sun hate each other from way back.
Apple? I think too much culture clash.
Oracle - less said, the better.
The original rumors included Citi. Citi shouldn't be buying ANYONE right now. They can't even do well in their own industry.
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 212
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
How about this news!!

http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2009/03/26/oracle_hp_joint_sun_deal/

~Vishwas
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1327
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
why doesn't Google buy Sun Microsystems?
 
Tim Holloway
Saloon Keeper
Posts: 27851
196
Android Eclipse IDE Tomcat Server Redhat Java Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Vishwas Hegde wrote:How about this news!!

http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2009/03/26/oracle_hp_joint_sun_deal/

~Vishwas



Well, it's rather old. Besides, getting bought by Compaq/HP didn't do all that much for DEC.
 
Mourouganandame Arunachalam
Ranch Hand
Posts: 398
Android Eclipse IDE Ubuntu
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Tim Holloway wrote:After careful meditation, I've decided that if SOMEBODY has to to it, I'd rather it be Cisco. But that's just the best of a set of bad alternatives.

IBM owns too much of Java already.
Microsoft owns too much of Everything Else and wants to tie it all irretrievably to Windows. Besides MS and Sun hate each other from way back.
Apple? I think too much culture clash.
Oracle - less said, the better.
The original rumors included Citi. Citi shouldn't be buying ANYONE right now. They can't even do well in their own industry.



I vote for Oracle rather.....
 
Tim Holloway
Saloon Keeper
Posts: 27851
196
Android Eclipse IDE Tomcat Server Redhat Java Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Mourouganandame Arunachalam wrote:

Tim Holloway wrote:After careful meditation, I've decided that if SOMEBODY has to to it, I'd rather it be Cisco. But that's just the best of a set of bad alternatives.

IBM owns too much of Java already.
Microsoft owns too much of Everything Else and wants to tie it all irretrievably to Windows. Besides MS and Sun hate each other from way back.
Apple? I think too much culture clash.
Oracle - less said, the better.
The original rumors included Citi. Citi shouldn't be buying ANYONE right now. They can't even do well in their own industry.



I vote for Oracle rather.....



Do you REALLY want the company that single-handedly kept Java 1.3.8 from going end-of-life for years to own Java?
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 174
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I have seen peple in Java world don't respect Oracle much. May I know the reasons.......
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 140
Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
What if no one buys Sun? Will Sun close down, what happens to java...
 
Mourouganandame Arunachalam
Ranch Hand
Posts: 398
Android Eclipse IDE Ubuntu
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I think SUN is seriously looking for good offers to sell, due to various reasons. One of the reason may be its loss in sever market.
 
Mourouganandame Arunachalam
Ranch Hand
Posts: 398
Android Eclipse IDE Ubuntu
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Vikram Kohli wrote:I have seen peple in Java world don't respect Oracle much. May I know the reasons.......



I disagree with this. I respect Oracle, for its strong RDBMS
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 212
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
why sun is being sold ?

Is it in loss ??
 
Author
Posts: 6055
8
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Sun is being sold because of declining revenues. I haven't followed it closely but from what i've gathered it's due to lossing share int he server market. Fundamentally Sun is a hardware company. These days companies are buying generic linux boxes or even using cloud systems (which in turn use generic linux boxos). Their workstation market also eroded over the years.

Sun != Java

Here again i haven't paid close attention the last few years but when I last checked Java was overseen by a steering committee made up of a number of companies. This steering committee in turn uses JSR's to advance the Java API's. Multiple companies implement these APIs in their JVM's. Sun is merely one member of the committee (albeit a special one). Sun also owns the Java trademarks.

Either some new company will own Sun, or Sun's assets will be sold off, including the Java trademarks and related rights. Even if "Java" disappears everyone will just start calling it "Jawa" or some other name. There's too much invested in Java software (proprietary, vendors, services) to just let the whole thing stop one day.

--Mark
 
Tim Holloway
Saloon Keeper
Posts: 27851
196
Android Eclipse IDE Tomcat Server Redhat Java Linux
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Sun reminds me of the old Xerox PARC. They've contributed a lot, but haven't managed to capitalize on it for their own benefit. As a result, they've been slowly circling the drain for years.

Their "iron" business - SPARC servers - has been steadily eroded over the last few years by Intel-based commodity systems. Unlike IBM's mainframes, Sun hasn't been able to demonstrate a clear technical superiority of their equipment over the off-the-shelf architectures. Their software products, which include Solaris, NetBeans, StarOffice, MySQL and Java are not real revenue producers. Solaris is now free in large part because that's the only real price that can compete against Linux (the OS is free, Sun charges for support). StarOffice was given a nominal price simply because if they gave it away, a lot of businesses wouldn't believe it was "real" software - it's only slightly different than the OpenOffice product that is the free version of it. MySQL has its profitable side, but not enough to support everyone else, and as for making money on Java...

Java is not public property. Sun has demonstrated (to Microsoft's pain) that it is in fact the sole owner of what is and isn't Java, insofar as the core language and libraries are concerned, In fact, one of the biggest concerns about a Sun buyout is that whoever ends up owning Java might not be as easygoing about it. Even Sun has their moments, which is why we adopted the CodeRanch domain. Ever so often a Sun lawyer goes on a tear about what's proper use of the "Java" moniker.
 
Greenhorn
Posts: 20
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I think IBM is still the last, best hope for Sun. My prediction is that the final result of all the testosterone-enhanced posturing will be a deal, much like the Oracle/BEA pas de deux
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 135
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Finally Sun went into Oracle Hands
Oracle aquisition
 
It's just like a fortune cookie, but instead of a cookie, it's pie. And we'll call it ... tiny ad:
a bit of art, as a gift, the permaculture playing cards
https://gardener-gift.com
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic