• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
  • Tim Cooke
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Rob Spoor
  • Junilu Lacar
  • paul wheaton
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Moores
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Scott Selikoff
  • Piet Souris
  • Jj Roberts
  • fred rosenberger

Using @JoinColumn VS not using @JoinColumn

Ranch Hand
Posts: 608
Eclipse IDE Spring Ubuntu
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi all,

I would just like to clarify the difference between the following 2 code samples from EJB3 in Action:
First code sample:

2nd Code Sample:

The 2nd code sample is missing the @JoinColumn.

So in the 1st case it would be possible to use the foreign key in the User table to locate the relevant Bid/s using SQL.

Whereas the 2nd case wouldn't have a foreign key BUT it would still be possible to access the relevant Bid/s through the User object's reference to a collection of Bids albeit only via JPQL this time?
pie. tiny ad:
Building a Better World in your Backyard by Paul Wheaton and Shawn Klassen-Koop
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic