• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Tim Cooke
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Knute Snortum
  • paul wheaton
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Ron McLeod
  • Piet Souris
  • Ganesh Patekar
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • salvin francis

CODE: Dynamic Sorting on Multiple Indexes

Ranch Hand
Posts: 57
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Here's a handy utility called “DynamicComparer”, that will dynamically sort an array or ArrayList on multiple fields, in ascending or descending order, without or without case sensitivity.

Using this, it is no longer necessary to allow sorting by having classes implement the Comparable interface, or writing custom Comparators for each business class.

I welcome feedback! Let me know if you think of any improvements.


Code here, in filename DynamicComparer.java

JUnit test here, in filename DynamicComparer_Test.java
Posts: 67280
Mac Mac OS X IntelliJ IDE jQuery Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
"Kamilche Unknown", please check your private messages for an important administrative matter.
Posts: 2700
IntelliJ IDE Opera
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Thank you for posting this. I ran 2 tests. The first gave a runtime error and the second did not really perform:

Gave: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: Field 'name' not found in class 'Test'!

Time: 38
Time: 0

That is a big difference and to much in most cases.
Cindy Carney
Ranch Hand
Posts: 57
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Thanks for the feedback. You got that error is because the field is not public - comparators can only access public fields.

You were spot on about the speed, though! Wow, it's abysmal - 20 to 70x slower than a normal comparator. I added a 'testCapacity' routine to the JUnit tests, and discovered what you meant.

I tried some different methods, and came up with this one. It is flexible, in that it will let you sort on multiple columns with different sort criteria, like DynamicComparer... but it performs much faster, and scales well. It also allows you to access private fields.

It's still slower than a custom comparator, so if you have a need for a one off fast sort, hand coding is probably the best way to go. This routine is mainly useful for small arrays, such as you might use during web development, when you're presenting a limited result set to the user, letting them choose their sort columns, and don't want to have to hit the database every time they click the sort button.

Give this one a whirl, I think you'll like it better. My timings are below:

  • Standard method: Sorted 100000 items in 47 milliseconds. This is the usual Java method, where you create a new custom comparator for each sort you want.
  • New method: Sorted 100000 items in 172 milliseconds. This is the new method I created, which uses a single custom comparator that handles all possible sorts you might want, with per-field direction and case sensitivity.
  • Lazy method: Sorted 100000 items in 3437 milliseconds. This method is like 'new', but calls a pre-done compareTo proc to get you out of handing-coding the compareTo proc. The pre-done compareTo proc uses reflection to look up the fields, so while it saves you coding work, this is the slowest method.

  • File MultiComparable.java

    File MultiComparer.java

    File TestClass.java

    File MultiComparable_Test.java

    The human mind is a dangerous plaything. This tiny ad is pretty safe:
    professionally read, modify and write PDF files from Java
    • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
    • New Topic
    Boost this thread!