• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Ron McLeod
  • Junilu Lacar
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Rob Spoor
  • Bear Bibeault
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Tim Holloway
  • Piet Souris
  • Carey Brown
  • Stephan van Hulst
Bartenders:
  • Frits Walraven
  • fred rosenberger
  • salvin francis

Choice of languages

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 20
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi, Bruce,

The title of your book sounds very exciting (yeah, I'm a geek). Which languages does it cover, and why did you choose those particular languages?

Thank you.

Best,
Helana Neumann
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 686
Netbeans IDE Chrome Ubuntu
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Ruby, Io, Prolog, Scala, Erlang, Clojure, Haskell

Its on the Amazon page : bookpage
 
Sheriff
Posts: 14691
16
Eclipse IDE VI Editor Ubuntu
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
"Why those seven" is explained here by the author.
 
Author
Posts: 71
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I chose those languages based on a poll by my publisher, mostly. That gave me a list of a bunch of languages. I did have a couple of rules.

1) I wanted exactly one object oriented language. (Not counting prototype languages.) Ruby was the top one, so I struck Python. I replaced it with the next language on the list, Prolog.
2) I did not want to cover Java, JavaScript, C or C++ for a variety of reasons. Mostly, they are all too popular, so it seemed like a little bit of a cop out. Plus, JavaScript has a bunch of problems for a book like this one. So I struck JavaScript, which made the top 5. I replaced it with another prototype language, Io. I am very pleased with the choice, and so are most of the readers. It is one of the purest prototype languages you'll find. The other options were Lua and Self.

The rest of the story is covered in the post referenced above. Thanks for the question, and good luck!
 
Bruce Tate
Author
Posts: 71
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Christophe Verré wrote:"Why those seven" is explained here by the author.



Thanks for the assist!
 
Bruce Tate
Author
Posts: 71
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Vyas Sanzgiri wrote:Ruby, Io, Prolog, Scala, Erlang, Clojure, Haskell

Its on the Amazon page : bookpage



And it's here as well: http://pragprog.com/titles/btlang/seven-languages-in-seven-weeks

A little trivia. An author usually gets a slightly higher royalty at the publisher's site. Thanks also to you for the assist.
 
clojure forum advocate
Posts: 3479
Mac Objective C Clojure
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
May I ask you why you picked Scala?
Actors are covered in Erlang, a JVM language is included in the shape of Clojure.
Why you didn't nominate OCaml in place of Scala (assuming it was included in the poll)?
 
Bruce Tate
Author
Posts: 71
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

John Todd wrote:May I ask you why you picked Scala?
Actors are covered in Erlang, a JVM language is included in the shape of Clojure.
Why you didn't nominate OCaml in place of Scala (assuming it was included in the poll)?



I wish I had something more profound to say, but my readers just requested it more than the other object oriented/functional hybrid alternatives. That, and my good friends Ted Neward and Venkat Subramanyam (there's no way I spelled that right) had all dabbled in Scala, and made it sound interesting.

But yes, actors are covered in Io, Scala, and Erlang. There are also actor-like models in Clojure.

Good question.
 
Bartender
Posts: 3225
34
IntelliJ IDE Oracle Spring Chrome Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Was Fantom programming language considered? I had started off learning that language- but after reading this thread I kind of backed off from Fantom and continued with Scala.

Any views on that?
 
Marshal
Posts: 73261
332
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Bruce Tate wrote: . . . Java, JavaScript, C or C++ for a variety of reasons. Mostly, they are all too popular, . . .

Agree: they are already well covered elsewhere. For that sort of book, it is better to go for less well-known languages.
 
Bruce Tate
Author
Posts: 71
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Mohamed Sanaulla wrote:Was Fantom programming language considered? I had started off learning that language- but after reading this thread I kind of backed off from Fantom and continued with Scala.

Any views on that?



I didn't really consider Fantom (was fan). I didn't know much about it.
 
Greenhorn
Posts: 4
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Campbell Ritchie wrote:

Bruce Tate wrote: . . . Java, JavaScript, C or C++ for a variety of reasons. Mostly, they are all too popular, . . .

Agree: they are already well covered elsewhere. For that sort of book, it is better to go for less well-known languages.



Just a link - Steve Yegge has lots to say about languages in his various blogs (he's very smart and funny:
http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2010/12/haskell-researchers-announce-discovery.html

) one I remembered was sort of "7 languages in one page" - Tour De Babel:
http://sites.google.com/site/steveyegge2/tour-de-babel

 
Bruce Tate
Author
Posts: 71
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Andy Bach wrote:

Campbell Ritchie wrote:

Bruce Tate wrote: . . . Java, JavaScript, C or C++ for a variety of reasons. Mostly, they are all too popular, . . .

Agree: they are already well covered elsewhere. For that sort of book, it is better to go for less well-known languages.



Just a link - Steve Yegge has lots to say about languages in his various blogs (he's very smart and funny:
http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2010/12/haskell-researchers-announce-discovery.html

) one I remembered was sort of "7 languages in one page" - Tour De Babel:
http://sites.google.com/site/steveyegge2/tour-de-babel



Yes! I remember that page. Steve was one of the guys who reviewed Beyond Java. We both liked Ruby, and both wanted a chance to be able to write it professionally. He's one of those guys who is just smarter than the rest of us. I have a tremendous amount of respect for what he was able to accomplish at Google.
 
Yup, yup, yup. Tiny ad:
Thread Boost feature
https://coderanch.com/t/674455/Thread-Boost-feature
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic