HI,
this is one of the links where JMS Bridge and SAF was explained very well.I could find some similarities and differences between both.
http://middlewaremagic.com/weblogic/?p=7969
Bridge:
1.It suppots interoperability and can be used between any two JMS implementaions.One with JMS weblogic and second can be any third party JMS Provider.supports the connectitivyt between any two versions of weblogic.
2.It uses two adapters whichy we need to configure while creating the source and target destinations.
One is XA based adapter which ensures exact-once delivery and eliminates duplicates.
second is JNDInoTX which will be used for at-least once delivery.
SAF on the other hand will be used in cases where there is possibility of network related issues and unavailability problems.SAF ensures guaranteed delivery as it stores the message on the local queue.
one area where i am confused is ,does JMS Bridge not store messages when the destination is not available?IF it stores,what is introduced as part of SAF feature?