Henry Wong wrote:
IMHO, I think a lot of the great ideas are just (somewhat silly) ideas that just took off via dumb luck. Think about it, a year ago, if someone said that the next hot idea will entail birds launched with a slingshot, would you have agreed?
Henry
How are Great IT Ideas born?
No Kaustubh No Fun, Know Kaustubh Know Fun..
Deepak Bala wrote:By stealing someone else's
(As much as I would like that to be a joke, it is sometimes not)
Jesper de Jong wrote:
Deepak Bala wrote:By stealing someone else's
(As much as I would like that to be a joke, it is sometimes not)
Indeed, this is what Microsoft's success is based on for a large part: take someone else's idea, make your own version of it, and sell it to the whole world so that everybody uses your version instead of the original one. They even tried to do this with Java: they had their own version of Java that they tried to add Windows-only stuff to, then they got sued by Sun, gave up on Java entirely and invented .NET, which works in exactly the same way as Java (their JVM is called the CLR - Common Language Runtime, etc.).
Often it's not the idea itself that has to be brilliant or revolutionary, but the way it is sold.
Saurabh Pillai wrote:Do you know Charles Darwin and his theory Survival_of_the_fittest?
Survival_of_the_fittest
SCJP 6. Learning more now.
Yahya Elyasse wrote:Yeah , james gosling is much smarter and creative than Bill Gate. and look what happened to James and look how Gates is the most rich person in this world. the world is so imperfect!
Yahya Elyasse wrote:
Saurabh Pillai wrote:Do you know Charles Darwin and his theory Survival_of_the_fittest?
Yes i know this theory very well . this is why i mentioned that our world is so imperfect. a world where only the fittest survive is surely Not a good place to live in.
Paul Clapham wrote:
Fortunately this isn't a world where "only the fittest survive". It's imperfect, certainly, it isn't possible to produce a perfect world, but there's plenty of scope for suboptimal organisms to survive. (I know this because I'm one of them.)
Paul Clapham wrote:Fortunately this isn't a world where "only the fittest survive". It's imperfect, certainly, it isn't possible to produce a perfect world, but there's plenty of scope for suboptimal organisms to survive. (I know this because I'm one of them.)
Kaustubh G Sharma wrote:I think the great idea born when someone thinks beyond the limit....There's an limit which always stop us thinking over it... These limit is also created by human and they don't want you to cross it...Think over it and yo'll get new ideas for sure...
Cheers
kaustubh
Saurabh Pillai wrote:
Hey Paul and Yahya,
In broad sense "Survival of the fittest" can be interpreted as somebody who understands the system very well and can exploit its loopholes in order to survive. and I do not agree with Yahya's statement that James Gosling is smarter than Bill Gates. If you are counting money as success then "Survival of the fittest" can be interpreted as Bill knows the system(world) better when it comes to marketing skills and hence able to earning more money than James.
Yahya Elyasse wrote:
Yeah , james gosling is much smarter and creative than Bill Gate. and look what happened to James and look how Gates is the most rich person in this world. the world is so imperfect!
No Kaustubh No Fun, Know Kaustubh Know Fun..
Kaustubh G Sharma wrote:
I don't think money is the only parameter to scale your success. There's no doubt about James quality..May be he's not a money maker or may be he don't want billion $$ but the gift he gave to the computer world is precious and priceless..
If I stare at something, it doesn't necessarily mean that it is beautiful..... because most of the time, I stare to see how ugly it truly is....
Petar Thomas wrote:
If I stare at something, it doesn't necessarily mean that it is beautiful..... because most of the time, I stare to see how ugly it truly is....
If I stare at something, it doesn't necessarily mean that it is beautiful..... because most of the time, I stare to see how ugly it truly is....
If I stare at something, it doesn't necessarily mean that it is beautiful..... because most of the time, I stare to see how ugly it truly is....
If I stare at something, it doesn't necessarily mean that it is beautiful..... because most of the time, I stare to see how ugly it truly is....
Petar Thomas wrote:That's really ockay... I'm used to be called like that. Sometimes I missread my own name as Peter as well. It's normal. I was called Pedro, also, and Nobody, and on my own language, Croatian, Black, "Crni".... I just hope that I didn't typed too much text into this forum, while drinking too many coffie, smoking cigarettes, and doing my thing...
If I stare at something, it doesn't necessarily mean that it is beautiful..... because most of the time, I stare to see how ugly it truly is....
If I stare at something, it doesn't necessarily mean that it is beautiful..... because most of the time, I stare to see how ugly it truly is....
Henry Wong wrote:
IMHO, I think a lot of the great ideas are just (somewhat silly) ideas that just took off via dumb luck. Think about it, a year ago, if someone said that the next hot idea will entail birds launched with a slingshot, would you have agreed?
Henry
My honeysuckle is blooming this year! Now to fertilize this tiny ad:
We need your help - Coderanch server fundraiser
https://coderanch.com/wiki/782867/Coderanch-server-fundraiser
|