Failed scoring 116/114

[Hector Moneo]

After nearly 3 months I have dobled checked in Pearson and I have failed part II. The scorings are:

Questions 18 of 24
ClassDiagram 30 of 40
Component Diagram 25 of 40
Deployment Diagram 22 of 24
Interaction Diagram 11 of 16
Technical Risks 10 of 16


I have failed due to I did not get the minimun score in the component diagram (25 where the minimun is 26), right? I am a bit disappointed, however I must say I screw it up on this part since I forgot to include the DB, and since I was using Start UML which does not fully support UML 2.0, I modelled each component with the class UML element stereotyped as <<component>>, which seems the reviewer did not like too much (This is the reviewer comment: Incorrect/inconsistent UML notation used for stereotypes)

I think I will spend some time adding the DB and using a full compliance UML 2.0 tool and resubmit the diagram ... However since I submitted the essay in September I need to do the mandatory course, right? I will try to go for the cheapest online trainning, even if it does not provide me anything usefull ... Has anybody done the SCEA online trainning?

[Jeanne Boyarsky]

Hector Moneo wrote: However since I submitted the essay in September I need to do the mandatory course, right??

Yes. Unfortunate to have to do it for *one* point!