Win a copy of Programmers Guide to Apache Thrift this week in the Open Source forum!
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Devaka Cooray
  • Knute Snortum
  • Paul Clapham
  • Tim Cooke
Sheriffs:
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Bear Bibeault
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Ron McLeod
  • Piet Souris
  • Frits Walraven
Bartenders:
  • Ganesh Patekar
  • Tim Holloway
  • salvin francis

Type-level annotation can all be overriden by the deployment descriptor?  RSS feed

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 1732
12
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
In ePractice Lab, mock exam 1,


Which two are true about specifying Java EE environment annotation metadata for session bean classes?
....
Choice E: type-level, method-level and field level annotations can all be overridden by the deployment descriptor.




EPractice Lab suggest this is the correct choice.
But @TransactionManagment, @ConcurrencyManagment are type-level annotation, but they cannot be overridden.
Also, according to Enthuware, we cannot override a session bean type by a dd. If we specify @Stateless for a bean, we cannot put <session-type>Singleton</session-type> to override the type of bean.

Any comments from EPractice Lab?
 
MyExamCloud Software Support
Posts: 692
2
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
You can find answer from this thread.
 
It is sorta covered in the JavaRanch Style Guide.
  • Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
Boost this thread!