• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

Java for numerics

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 101
1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I make test million quartic equations in C++,C# nad Java: https://github.com/borneq/quartic
On Intel I3, one thread, release C++ and C#, beyond IDE,
C++ 5.99 s
C++ 64 bits 4.91 s.
C# - 5.12
Java 2.64 s!
Why Java time is so good? C++ operates on stack without new/delete, floating-point operations depends on hardware (coprocessor), the same Complex lib.
Java is the base for numeric? Unfortunately Java has not operators overloading, that is nice for complex, vectors and matrices.
 
Rancher
Posts: 1093
29
Netbeans IDE Oracle MySQL Database Tomcat Server C++ Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
In general, Java is faster because of the JIT Compiler.
 
Thanks tiny ad, for helping me escape the terrible comfort of this chair.
a bit of art, as a gift, the permaculture playing cards
https://gardener-gift.com
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic