• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Bear Bibeault
  • Ron McLeod
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Paul Clapham
  • Tim Cooke
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • Junilu Lacar
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • fred rosenberger
  • salvin francis
  • Piet Souris
  • Frits Walraven
  • Carey Brown

CopyHelper/Access Beans

Posts: 16
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hello all,

I am just wondering which method is more faster/a better design principle..

The session beans(facades) and the entity beans live in the same JVM, so session beans can use the Local interfaces to call the entity beans, but the problem is that we can't use the Factory/Access beans(that are generated with the remote interfaces).

The Factory/Access beans have a lot of methods that will greatly reduce the developement time(lookups,creates,set/synchxxx methods)..so which is the best methodology to use? To bear the network traffic and use copy helpers / use local interfaces but go through all the setMethods?.

No, tomorrow we rule the world! With this tiny ad:
Building a Better World in your Backyard by Paul Wheaton and Shawn Klassen-Koop
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic