• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Tim Cooke
  • Devaka Cooray
Sheriffs:
  • Liutauras Vilda
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
Saloon Keepers:
  • Tim Moores
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Piet Souris
  • Mikalai Zaikin
Bartenders:
  • Carey Brown
  • Roland Mueller

Now What , Mocks are boring

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 28
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi All , I have written the mock test to a point where I'm getting 100% most everytime. I'm not sure if I know the material thouroughly , or now just know all the answers. I have never done ANY UML before this and I'm a bit scared about the whole cert thing. How well do you need to know all the diagrams ? Is it enough that I know what each one is and basically have an understanding of w3hat each does ? Or should I know everything there is to know about them ?
I know 100% is obviously good , but I still feel unprepared. I have 10 days left before I have to write and I want to ensure I get this sucker the first time.
Any and all suggestions are welcomed !
 
Greenhorn
Posts: 29
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Don't scared by other's OO experience. I am stdying in BS CS Final Year with no OOA&D Experience, and got 92% by just reading that two books.
Go on, Take the real Test
Tahir Mansoori
SCJP2 91%
IBM OOA&D 92%
 
David Donovan
Greenhorn
Posts: 28
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
How important is the distinction between Conceptual, Specification & Implementation perspectives in Class diagrams ? Can anyone give me a simple explanation of the differences ?
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 776
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Consistent 90+ on IBM mock and you will pass.
So take the test.
Regards, Guy
 
Greenhorn
Posts: 26
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hello
I believe the distinction between conceptual, Specification & Implementation perspectives is very very important conceptual level class diagrams is not a s/w entity it is all about what users actually thinks abt the world, it is the concepts in the minds of users e.g. hospital, Customer, Store, Bank etc. more or less these are real entities existing in the real world in time &/or space. there is no distinction b/n attributes & association in a class diagram which itself signify that we are talking abt real world & not s/w entities. Conceptual level class diagram are used during analysis phase of development.

When we are talking about class diagrams with the specification view, we are talking abt s/w entities & we are talking abt what a s/w entity is capable of doing. What are the responsibilities of this s/w entity(class) we are looking after interface of this class. Java beans are a good example of revealing it properties through introspection it is telling the JSP Container that it can tell the outside world abt its properties but not how.from a spec. perspective there is no distinction b/n generalization & realization, in fact generalization is one way of implementing realization.only public methods are drawn in a spec. pers. class doagram. It also implies the responsibilty of updating relationship with associated objects, if navigability is also present then who has the responsibility of updating relationship.

From impl pers. a class diagram include fields & public, private, protected methods.Now we are talking abt code & other nitty gritty.
Hope this helps

Deepak Arora
IBM Certified OOAD with UML(79%)
IBM Certified XML Developer(68%)
Sun Certified JAva Programmer(85%)

 
Deepak Arora
Greenhorn
Posts: 26
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hello kosaic,
I believe the distinction between conceptual, Specification & Implementation perspectives is very very important conceptual level class diagrams is not a s/w entity it is all about what users actually thinks abt the world, it is the concepts in the minds of users e.g. hospital, Customer, Store, Bank etc. more or less these are real entities existing in the real world in time &/or space. there is no distinction b/n attributes & association in a class diagram which itself signify that we are talking abt real world & not s/w entities. Conceptual level class diagram are used during analysis phase of development.

When we are talking about class diagrams with the specification view, we are talking abt s/w entities & we are talking abt what a s/w entity is capable of doing. What are the responsibilities of this s/w entity(class) we are looking after interface of this class. Java beans are a good example of revealing it properties through introspection it is telling the JSP Container that it can tell the outside world abt its properties but not how.from a spec. perspective there is no distinction b/n generalization & realization, in fact generalization is one way of implementing realization.only public methods are drawn in a spec. pers. class doagram. It also implies the responsibilty of updating relationship with associated objects, if navigability is also present then who has the responsibility of updating relationship.

From impl pers. a class diagram include fields & public, private, protected methods.Now we are talking abt code & other nitty gritty.
Hope this helps

Deepak Arora
IBM Certified OOAD with UML(79%)
IBM Certified XML Developer(68%)
Sun Certified JAva Programmer(85%)

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 54
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
kosaic ,
How did you progress...i mean as far as the score goes? How did you do it the first time?
 
David Donovan
Greenhorn
Posts: 28
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
The first time I wrote , before studying I got a 53% ,, next came a 60% , then I was forced to look up a few ( 10-15 ) questions as I couldnt figure out IBM's rationale , once I saw the way they picked their answers , I immediately progressed to a 86% , then on to the 95-100 range.
Still a bit scared I know the answers as opposed to knowing the material but maybe I'm just freaking myself out. I have 0% OOAD experience but I have my Java 2 certification , Win2000 Certified , have my Visualage certification and also my Websphere certification. I find OOAD easier because I program in Java i guess.
Any words of wisdom are welcomed !
 
Honk if you love justice! And honk twice for tiny ads!
We need your help - Coderanch server fundraiser
https://coderanch.com/wiki/782867/Coderanch-server-fundraiser
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic