Win a copy of Murach's MySQL this week in the JDBC and Relational Databases forum!

nimo frey

Ranch Hand
+ Follow
since Jun 28, 2008
Merit badge: grant badges
For More
Cows and Likes
Total received
In last 30 days
Total given
Total received
Received in last 30 days
Total given
Given in last 30 days
Forums and Threads
Scavenger Hunt
expand Ranch Hand Scavenger Hunt
expand Greenhorn Scavenger Hunt

Recent posts by nimo frey

Does anyone know the difference of

and that:

Which one should I prefer?
11 years ago
Hello both,

sorry sorry. I was so blind! Yes, you are absolutely right.

It is if you make that a field of the object.

I like JV’s suggestion of an automatically incremented field.

I was lost in fussiness;) (Serializable objects and so on..). But now it is clear!

Thank you for your patient!

11 years ago
I guess, I dont want to use the identityHashCode.

It is better to use a real unique id. However, I do not persist the entity in a database, so I am not able to use a database-id-field.

I guess, I cannot use the

UUID a = UUID.randomUUID();

When I generate a UUID for the instance x and the client sends that UUID back to me, the instance x is no more binded to that UUID.
So I cannot compare it with the servers UUID as generating a new one for the instance x results in another UUID. I cannot use a singleton-class or the like.

Maybe, this is the right thing to do:
UUID b = UUID.fromString(this.toString());

I dont know.

However, I guess, the best is to use override the toString()-Method of my Object and use the String as a Identifier.

Both, Thanks for your help!
11 years ago
Oh, actually I have no collisions - all my instances are identifiable via the string version of the hashCode.

So what should I use instead? Should I override the toString-Version for identification?

So I do not use this '1448505687' but use the string-version "hobbies: soccer|name: paul|age:22|state:null". Is this better?
11 years ago
1) I know. I wrote my hashCode/equals-Method with these methods.

2) I am generating the hashCode of an instance and cast it to a string X. This string, I gave it to the client (for example: web-view). When client sends the X to me, I can look, what object it is by using String.valueOf(_o.hashCode).equals(X).

As I stated before: The client has no java-object, so I cannot use _o.equals(X), because X is not a Java-Object, it is a string-identification of the java-object.

The only question I have is:

Should I use a toString-Method of the instance or can I rely on the computed hashCode (which is also unique) to identify my object-instance from the client to the server.

Actually it works without failure, but I am not sure, if I made it totally right.
11 years ago
I use the Objects.hash and Objects.equals-Methods of Java7 to override hash/equals-Method. All works fine.

I have this question:

Can I use the hashCode of an instance for temporarly identification or should I use a string-version (by overriding toString) to identify this object.

For example:

The instance a of type O is represented by the hashCode '1448505687' and this string-version "hobbies: soccer|name: paul|age:22|state:null".

I have a list of O's and want to look, if the list contains the "instance a", which I get it from the client.
The client has either the hashCode or the string-version of the instance!
So I get only the hashCode or the string-version of "instance a".

Which version should I use:

// client gives me the instance a in form of the hashCode

// client gives me the instance a in form of an identifiable string-version of a:

So which version should I use? Both actually works, but I am not sure, if I can rely on the hashCode everytime. Which is better?
11 years ago
Oh, so should I do something like that:

Is this better ?
Thanks it works, but I how do I solve that, when using module-pattern:

I want to call Submodule by string:

Something like

does not work.
I have a common js-object:

I know, I can call property a via or via .

I want to do something like this:

But it does not work. How can I do that? Should I use eval or call() or something?
I was so blind! You are right!

I am using jsf with templating and had something like this <ui:remove>

within the tags which was called by javascript.

So that was the reason.

Thanks !!
I have a self invoking function with a window.onload in it. But the window.onload is not really called after windows is loaded. Often, myBtn returns null as the chrome-debugger says

"Uncaught TypeError: Cannot set property 'onclick' of null".

Why is that so? How can I solve that?

Using jquery and this script returns the same error:

I have put the script into the head-element.

I know, that document.ready will run immediately after DOM is built.
Self-invoking functions will run instantly - but window-onload should, normally should run after dom is built.
But this is not the case. Why?
I added the parent-property (the string-identifier of the parent component in which my component is put):

The use of my component:

now returns the following error:

java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: java.lang.ClassCastException@2b4193b3
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor213.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(
at javax.faces.component.UIComponentBase$AttributesMap.put(
at javax.faces.component.UIComponentBase$AttributesMap.put(
at com.sun.faces.facelets.tag.jsf.CompositeComponentTagHandler$CompositeComponentRule$LiteralAttributeMetadata.applyMetadata(
at com.sun.faces.facelets.tag.MetadataImpl.applyMetadata(
11 years ago
Unfortunately, ":client-view" does also not work:

<f:ajax> contains an unknown id ':client-view' - cannot locate it in the context of the component test-id.

When I look at the client-code, that the component has indeed the "client-view" as ID. (no ":my-form:client-view", as I wrapped the component with <h:form id="my-form" prependId="false">).

Why does my JSF-component not find the ID of its parent?
11 years ago
I want to organize/structure/encapsulate all my jquery javascript code:

I have a file "mypage_version1.js" with the following content (VERSION 1):

How can I organize it better?

Does the file "mypage_version2.js" with the following content (VERSION 2) structures the code better than "VERSION 1"?:

I am in doubt, which version is better (both works).

Version 1 is shorter, but cluttered within the file.

What is best practice?

I have a component called "test":

and the "view.xhtml" which uses the component "test":

When rendering "view.xhtml", then I get the following error:

How can I solve that?

(Besides, when using <f:ajax render="@form" /> within the component-component all works, but I want to assign a ID to limit the rendering.)

11 years ago