Jignesh Patel

Thanks, Tim and Liutauras.
Our team is not new to version control, and most of the coding will use microservice concepts, probably using fast APIs and an Amazon Web Services network. In that context, continuing a feature-based or GitHub Flow seems more appropriate. That also fits better for TDD.

So, switching gears, in the feature-based, what is a more appropriate approach, CI/CD checks putting at the pull request or every push in a remote feature branch?  Github advised me to do this at the time of the pull request, but I did work on a project where CI/CD was integrated at every push for each feature. Which approach fits for TDD?

is there any suggestions about using gitflow for the larger project?

If there is a need to transfer the data between 10000 tenants via kafka to s3, is it advisable to create 10000 topics - one for each tenant and then similarly creating one bucket for each tenant?
is there better architecture solution than this?

Which one is more appropriate to use Angular vs React.
Seems there are more developers available to hire for React vs Angular and it is faster for development?

While using microservices it is recommended to use a saga pattern with two different microservices doing two different transactions.
I have the following use case.
A patient gets discharged from the hospital, now there are two different services connected to two completely different databases(don't ask me why, as that is a technical constraint). The first microservice says I have successfully discharged you but the other one fails. Following the saga pattern now system needs to execute the compensating transaction, which is to reject the discharge, but the discharge is already done, and rolling back is quite a difficult task as there are so many things happening in that particular system for the discharge. What could be possible options? for that?

Ben
What is the difference between part 1 and part 2?
Does all examples are based on gradle or maven?

It does works after adding following

@Acknowledgment(Acknowledgment.Strategy.POST_PROCESSING) public CompletionStage<Void> process(Message<String> jsonDataReceive) {   service.process(jsonDataReceive.getPayload());    return jsonDataReceive.ack(); }

but then it gives following error:
Cannot start a JTA transaction from the IO thread.

We have a following code using Java 17 and quarkus
@Incoming("requests")
   @Outgoing("billingdata")
   @Blocking
   public void process(String jsonDataReceive) {
       LOG.info("Receive JSON ::"+jsonDataReceive);
       LOG.info("Quote Request::"+jsonDataReceive);
       service.process(jsonDataReceive);
   }

However, this code is not able to handle  multiple requests(More Data) at the same time and looses the connection with kafka. What will be possible solution

how to handle private method which is called inside the testing method? In your book there is a section which mention that there is nothing wrong in private fields and methods so that is very encoring.

Thank you very much for all these information. Just purchased one.
Wondering if there is maven based configuration provided?

Michał Płachta wrote:
In short, you invert the control by passing a function to a function.

Interesting thinking!!! Another good reason to purchase the book. As this concept requires a bit of study with the clear head.

How we can experience inversion of control in context of functional programming?

The book references SPARQL query language.That is a new term to me? What is that? How it is useful in functional programming

Micheal
I am coming from Java background, so I find the following topic very interesting:

"Designing with functions and types instead of objects"


can you elaborate more that what is being covered for this.

so the book is not depend on specific language.